X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IIeSW7ZiRs+dPiq3
	bZimAIf5k7y+bIRM5iYrOG6oBVNx9nVRD5Q8C98JA2D2NTFTLwJqQq6yQnOimIoR
	NaKZpUXT1JwY2SDhqusaRqRIbdliWjSWdwW3piO4bv9vzOeSxxYlv+LfDLMqvHaT
	u+UnBVv5QVy2fjL7YKW1rgsKasY=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=WzMhUdPlX74j0lrjcvFSjW
	KdOvE=; b=Y3bJJdv0uZxOfk9Ue73IOEcBdxMf2YsVVQTvLGPP4e5LY35BVOXb4d
	XCdDAm+pDuCTcHL0SL0yM9p2b44eGtqa4g4xB2Db6DbMJdgplUMho2wd5exu8o1N
	bhJaTJARGBPAzDmKC/nu2gtK5Q74xdO9+hjbye9bqS+r7g8dfHL40=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<538DF2D8.8030504@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:07:52 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Compiling cygwin1.dll
References:	<CAALQ5rnJz9h-EHYR2UqoznOrhTVsqaqgX1KiWeD+fo1iKVt7sw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <161164160 DOT 20140603143233 AT yandex DOT ru> <CAALQ5rmK5pJEtJztUXs103YMmc1LE0O8DO7sb+1sBgFbsKt-Jg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<CAALQ5rmK5pJEtJztUXs103YMmc1LE0O8DO7sb+1sBgFbsKt-Jg@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/03/2014 08:57 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Michael Wild!
>>
>>> In order to pinpoint an error I'm trying to compile cygwin1.dll from
>>> source following the instructions here:
>>
>> My question is: do you actually need to rebuild it, or you just need the debug
>> symbols?
>>
>>> https://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.programming.building-cygwin. However,
>>> when building binutils, I trip over this error:
>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-02/msg00064.html. According to
>>> DJ (https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-02/msg00067.html),
>>> "attempts to build the old binutils/gdb in CVS are going to be
>>> doomed". Apparently the development of these packages is now tracked
>>> in a separate git repo. So, my question is now, how do I get a working
>>> build for the cygwin DLL? Do I have to replace binutils/gdb in the CVS
>>> checkout with the git checkout?
>>
>>> How are the current snapshots built?
>>
>>> Thanks for any pointers in the right direction.
>
>
> Dear Andrey,
>
> I really need to build it, in order to pinpoint which commit breaks things.

OK but why are you building 'binutils' if you just want to build the Cygwin
DLL?


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -