X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=arn
	NxwYs8h74Kr+btTi7dYOdLeFIqZy+cskJ+DDzLDg7eETRE69cr+JhsJfMvRSVMSq
	CUxR0brQFRGv+Q7tGqKJUpxjNIdi1ln88KGEan2o4h/4tSnJjnKR32XxnyXcrBMH
	LqkKJyUDbUhU/2CWElvRHwciFoRz4v3qFO9uWHV4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=laHeu8x/S
	ksgSTWEFL4RcuxfMpQ=; b=UcNQQXHDEyYgDa2As+NCzTvuu9hn2Rv6XcID8YEAh
	A0frvwhsfzWxW9tys4EXN3N0IbPPhEvVGIBrbuotIcNTkrubehfQBl9t11cko5T2
	bON/KhkhAxEHJF3BzcJYnyEZrjaLOWZuPTG7ZBIcG4g+WKfaBDr/L1jtyYctxQZi
	wU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	limerock03.mail.cornell.edu
X-CornellRouted:	This message has been Routed already.
Message-ID:	<5374053E.3080007@cornell.edu>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 20:07:26 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Default manifest
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests?  It 
looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed 
something:

   https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01387.html
   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790#c9
   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807#c8

I'm not trying to rush any maintainers, but I'm asking because I 
currently have to use a self-built version of binutils, which doesn't 
provide a default manifest, because of the problem I reported here:

   http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00199.html

Thanks.

Ken

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -