X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=lweimFl3ooxZY1qZpogO4S0HrFDHSeNvmz/Z0gOREo4
	8MHdyvrF/grpGLUCUC66tBZT+c3mOOv3v7qG+zoaiHeP2B613eYJkP7XttQgxeKA
	2zX7qH7JDevR2Cbl+v/HRrpKX6tQJ3WaxPB8jU9GoXSVTvmswYFuHtJXFyZCizzY
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=uW907TPOFxgEWxKyiolt3K3OZfY=; b=Yxvls6HSj1Ber8f9l
	ujBkbX+Cm5WxKrIQVlqntBUp7DL+QD/E0GasKlcJK9mAp9moG/evcfKc1cBhQMFy
	aMXpuzvyIxIKLN7tvbr76ZPBZW5S3VO5IerGFtMPllafhvM49ZQAsBVdfjlFWhTr
	BtBk4pAw7eMb1X/xxF4lK9CVdk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f181.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.194.201.73 with SMTP id jy9mr4691687wjc.51.1399416283542; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<536965D8.3080503@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 May 2014 00:44:40 +0200
From:	jdzstz <jdzstz AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter
References:	<CA+wAnvyrB2ecwdJsvzqmMNjPFTnW6rT0rYdNcXRbK4z5WJqwyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <535CC856 DOT 7050808 AT gmail DOT com> <20140505123459 DOT GJ30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140505152821 DOT GA7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20140505152821.GA7694@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Hi Corinna,

I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin snapshot 
2014-05-05 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now TCP_NODELA​Y 
functionality works fine.

In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have any 
estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30?

Thank you


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -