X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=s/6d8yIb0QZNVvKd
	EnZPcsU96BX+xc4aisk8lC6tO4NaeKL4dXcDpF+RHaGwjjCNdtFGyduUxTLm9OdI
	jTktcFy4ADCKYLv/F55zxwwJqdqHUefCRum0Qlp8KQMY5M41asP8IKKroMLpZW9d
	zmCLeharQHAoOlR6P1SWaAhIKMI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=wAP8/z/qzVr74gyqH0zNGR
	DO9N8=; b=UEr/+/nQ+AcmwzzWDeshD6iPhGPv6AKvvxV8E4CHmjQL8hBfaYT93p
	S8cDz7u+CuGjsZ/CWU81wag8Q5jrJYv14NaTFddsrE7wv+wVhqNZmmA9IE+2Cx9s
	B7rjoQBiJUXu6ozAGKSLeVMwyJ/63QnhecV21eULXZmPsmwl8MkC0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173019pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<53680C04.6050609@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 May 2014 18:09:08 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problem with "None" Group on Non-Domain Members
References:	<536796E4 DOT 2090009 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505135928 DOT GK30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53679D5C DOT 5030209 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505144745 DOT GA6993 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367ACED DOT 40409 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505154230 DOT GB7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367B990 DOT 8050907 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505165723 DOT GM30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367DEE5 DOT 5010407 AT breisch DOT org> <5367EA1F DOT 3060800 AT cygwin DOT com> <5368094E DOT 7040806 AT breisch DOT org>
In-reply-to:	<5368094E.7040806@breisch.org>

On 05/05/2014 05:57 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 02:56 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On May 5 12:17, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
>>>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>>> An strace of `chmod 400 bar' might sched some light on this issue,
>>>>>> but I
>>>>>> have a gut feeling the underlying WIndows call will not even return an
>>>>>> error code...
>>>>> Attached. Your gut seems to be working today...
>>>>
>>>> There *is* something weird here. Look at this:
>>>>
>>>>> 151 36702 [main] chmod 5536 alloc_sd: uid 1001, gid 513, attribute
>>>>> 0x2190
>>>>> 65 36767 [main] chmod 5536 cygsid::debug_print: alloc_sd: owner SID
>>>>> = S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001 (+)
>>>>> 70 36837 [main] chmod 5536 cygsid::debug_print: alloc_sd: group SID
>>>>> = S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001 (+)
>>>>
>>>> alloc_sd (the underlying function creating a security descriptor) gets
>>>> a uid 1001 and gid 513 as input, as usual. But the owner *and* group
>>>> SIDs of the file's existing security descriptor is
>>>> S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001, the SID of your user
>>>> account.
>>>>
>>>> Why is your user account the primary group of the file, even though
>>>> your user token definitely has "None" (513) as its primary group?
>>>> How did it get there?
>>>>
>>> I don't have a clue. You're the expert. :)
>>>
>>
>> I'm wondering if we're getting the user id as the group for the MS
>> Account because there is no group id. Chris, what does 'id' for
>> each of these accounts look like and is the group id (assuming they
>> are different that the user id) in there?
>>
>>
>
> Well, I hope I'm not comparing apples and oranges, because now I'm at home.
> However, I have duplicated the scenario and results on this machine. It was
> actually where I noticed it first.
>
> id produces expected results:
>
> MS account:
> $ id
> uid=1001(Chris) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),545(Users),1003(HomeUsers)
>
> Local account:
> $ id
> uid=1007(cjb) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),545(Users),1003(HomeUsers)

<snip>

OK, thanks.  That answers my question but doesn't give any insight into
the original issue. :-(

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -