X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:date; q=dns; s=default; b=bcLu+vW33jyPZ4SdW3hyHnBZcW
	ib7mQQW95vsdCyrr5vZSsOByfXyQTeAoahkgbiA0MncXpcuQp/rZd3WLmwWGtWkt
	iAcytd+ciuKWdTjft4RzVrPu4rzHM5KtAaM9amx8AWzz1SZH/G92mRqZntd0oYob
	SHlJ8OQSQRJlkrpuQ=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:date; s=default; bh=898eu3rYIMEeZqnEIMs22yb5+5A=; b=
	NYtgmD15pzR1+nrcTf/IWnLe0DKk/7FkaxgnbYy5taEN8HHfcHyHAJq9D7IDlwDm
	Z7oyLvnPklvI2PvR8xJfJGkeb163izGqeMOYcvRQNUB7mT1pHxdH1JrrMvDFgpMt
	QkTCKC3G1thfgzpU+r+h3d5Wq4KXT6qVfvPP91Mxjfk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	nm17-vm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Message-ID:	<112218.65526.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	BDVluRmswBBpb4.UU1_zlPhs_ysfXcBVjBNXyWpyS_6pPgE-
X-Rocket-Received:	from solabel10.tnolan.com (tednolan AT 74 DOT 243 DOT 198 DOT 236 with plain [98.138.84.52]) by smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2014 17:38:06 +0000 UTC
From:	tednolan AT bellsouth DOT net
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Wow, just hit RCS bug
In-reply-to:	<87bnw12nuu.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References:	<694832 DOT 7961 DOT bm AT smtp113 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <87bnw12nuu DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
Comments:	In-reply-to Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de> message dated "Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:19:53 +0200."
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:05:58 -0400
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

In message <87bnw12nuu DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>you write:
>tednolan AT bellsouth DOT net writes:
>> Just for the record, the suggested env var fix
>>
>> RCS_MEM_LIMIT=0
>>
>> to "force stdio" does not work for me, but the
>
>That was never suggested as a fix, but to show that the problem occurs
>with files much less than 256kiB size when forcing the code path through
>stdio (which is what the "0" setting does).  The RCS test suite passes
>on Cygwin since it never actively tests this code path.
>
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/142346
>
>> RCS_MEM_LIMIT=10240
>>
>> to allow 10megs of diffs does..
>
>Which will fail once you happen upon a diff that gets that large.
>

Ah, OK -- I was just looking for a fix or workaround and didn't read
what the "=0" was supposed to do closely enough.

I can't see ever getting up to 10M of diffs, but still I consider
it an "existential" level bug for a version control system and think
the package should be removed.  It's almost as bad as if "ls -l foo"
unlinked "foo".

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -