X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ZdSdQuFEoJrWEy2YwAy7ORPX6fK85xDVVU4ACs43n494XGConbBsw
	q1tXc4tCzRsOE3YaJdLU0cBdd9nm0ZEdLmbNbJz7KfsDUACcrizX7rsxRCxam/PM
	APsc/lL4Yss05WEgBodV2E9um4FJpXYOyXFjQjmPigOwotHAdgOjfE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=/nwVqe/+t3UIdYoRVclzHF9mQ9M=; b=FhMNT9iAH+XIk/7uY2GvQBCtzbHW
	YBo+4dIW/IeZLrqq8Vdya/VgM77aUnXmNmaVE7hFvcs1EIhiVb9MA8ynj2Fun8uh
	D/P2AlcHZ3i/jtBq1qAYwl5nmfSiuyGJNqG4TVSwZpPr7NARN4/8RQ4Fkd16C6Fp
	ZgPYHGZizjinQJU=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:43:08 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Still testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration
Message-ID:	<20140416154308.GV3271@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20140410145323 DOT GB2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53487C6E DOT 9010905 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140412111325 DOT GA3271 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53494BAA DOT 3020005 AT cornell DOT edu> <534DA152 DOT 2080304 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140416080420 DOT GO3271 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140416093519 DOT GQ3271 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <534EA18D DOT 60200 AT cornell DOT edu> <534EA277 DOT 1080404 AT cornell DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<534EA277.1080404@cornell.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--te9Bkl2b4W0C+FfQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 16 08:32, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 4/16/2014 8:28 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >On 4/16/2014 2:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Apr 16 10:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>On Apr 15 14:14, Ken Brown wrote:
> >>>>I've come across a glitch involving sshd and cygserver.  [...]
> >>>>Now I close the Cygwin Terminal, stop both services, and restart
> >>>>them in the other order (cygserver first, then sshd).  Repeating
> >>>>steps 3 and 4, I can't login:
> >>>>
> >>>>$ ssh kbrown-admin AT localhost
> >>>>kbrown-admin AT localhost's password:
> >>>>Permission denied, please try again.
> >>>>kbrown-admin AT localhost's password:
> >>>>
> >>>>Notice that (a) I didn't get a prompt for the passphrase for my ssh
> >>>>key, and (b) my password wasn't accepted.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for the report, Ken.  I'll have a look.
> >>
> >>To clarify:  This is a non-domain machine, right?  And sshd is running
> >>under the cyg_server account while cygserver is running under the
> >>LocalSystem account?
> >
> >Yes to all.
> >
> >>I'm just testing this, only with a domain machine and domain accounts,
> >>and I can't reproduce this.  I have a bit of a problem to test this on a
> >>non-domain machine because my network is set up for domain machines...
> >>
> >>However, I found that I made a blatant mistake in cygserver.  The
> >>message length was computed one byte too short, so the trailing \0 in
> >>the passwd/group string wasn't transmitted.  This *might* be the cause
> >>for your problem.
> >>
> >>I just built a new snapshot.  Can you please try if this fixes it for
> >>you?  Make sure to use the new cygserver!
> >
> >Yes, that fixed it.  Thanks.
> >
> >>While I was at it, I also added a patch to get rid of the "setsockopt
> >>IPV6_TCLASS 16: Protocol not available" message.
> >
> >Good.  It's nice to see that anymore.
>                   ^
>                  not

Thanks for testing!  I had hoped that this is the culprit.   The
difference was obviously something realted to using or not using
cygserver...


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--te9Bkl2b4W0C+FfQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=5oJi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--te9Bkl2b4W0C+FfQ--

- Raw text -