X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=w5LhcZXW81r8Cays
	1vW46BASoESoe98ZO3jxIqQM5EUvu8UXUwuxf7BLTWK4aDGOt9tjxErq3GNbkF4+
	ibzLKmo2dsMhu7yEX9hoWJtTJbDzYOGaY4POCfqDUo/v61ptUmD9efJU22on/HX0
	aBfmaT3SjXPXV1lUMB0rGl7jaEI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=LaEkbNp1Jwvoy8pHkefWLM
	ecfX0=; b=OWpfJqOW5r9TyqZBqDZiuQ0zu1TXgDeoQgiGj3tkUEQyL2msAaM/sE
	RqikjqDN9JBNOtCWUKzgoTcYp2Imvvkd25Zy9azfYocCqw29Um2CDp5eFnHvhPDD
	gdXeYA62OzgnX3MexqLXBamqkvz5CbuOYWBg35NI+Ue+6oIcAz6ds=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:57:46 +0400
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<1457066472.20140414125746@yandex.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Still testing needed: New passwd/group AD/SAM integration
In-Reply-To:	<20140414080807.GI3271@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20140410145323 DOT GB2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5346B667 DOT 3040704 AT breisch DOT org> <20140410152809 DOT GD2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5346E55D DOT 6020405 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140410190424 DOT GK2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5346FCF9 DOT 5000908 AT redhat DOT com> <20140411121948 DOT GC23281 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <818978797 DOT 20140413143439 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140414080807 DOT GI3271 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> > What bugs me a bit is what this means for applications which expect
>> > fixed usernames.  Sshd, for instance, expects the fixed username
>> > "sshd" right now when using privilege separation.  I discussed this
>> > with the OpenSSH devs, and they understand the problem, but they think
>> > this should be handled by a Cygwin-specific function.  So there's some
>> > extra work in it for me to get OpenSSH up to speed with this change,
>> > but I fear I'm not the only one.  The more configurable stuff like this
>> > is, the more complicated it gets maintaining some packages.
>> 
>> I really don't see a problem. Is this implementation-dependent issue?
>> 99% you are operating within "current domain" and do not need to specify
>> domain prefix at all.

> Uh, but you're missing the situation where the machine is a domain
> machine but the privilege separation account "sshd" is created in
> the local SAM.  That's what the ssh-host-config script might do.
> Sshd will have to use MACHINE<separator>sshd as username for privsep
> in this case.

Never been in such situation, thanks for clarification.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 14.04.2014, <12:57>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -