X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=ack48xsEj8T0yE8QauAoGeISqWJX74/wQmgSUC6GZfP
	qegeqnNd2MkMh3CV+5HXHs/NVLsUyIIeFu7tuLgO/si1Afpmk+wof4y3WxeQpkbs
	5GwAPLNoGKzD7mkJZY6H2y/mB6x4hEmDpPZFb7UnpyCWjUUmBtmdN0d72z0D3+YM
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=FqU+wcUIGgf2qwO0rEvAgb+CUQI=; b=bOHCScaW5wd4muf+k
	WEHU49I9+64Hwwe/UGxF4wUcQT91PxfZfzLKAo6d7ebfy65Yqw9xlo34UiX7sCq6
	PhjqbA/xNzGXWdDHiXrNhovckYMUBGGXAnHGx1YF2WyGjKqgkCNKiTrpXVfgznRy
	FK1SiKGo/cTmQif3ERhn3en9P0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mailout01.t-online.de
Message-ID:	<5346BF4C.2090403@t-online.de>
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:57:00 +0200
From:	Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] base-files-4.2-1: Change prompt if running with admin rights
References:	<53458036 DOT 1010307 AT t-online DOT de> <877g6ys69r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <5345C0C0 DOT 5010908 AT t-online DOT de> <20140410081130 DOT GW2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20140410081130.GW2437@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr  9 23:50, Christian Franke wrote:
>> I used the registry check in the past because it only uses shell
>> builtins and does not rely on specific SID->gid mappings in
>> /etc/group.
> Especially given that in future there might be no /etc/group to begin
> with.
>
> But even without /etc/group, the administrator's group will have the
> gid 544.  I think such a test should be sufficient?

Yes.

Result would only differ for special accounts like "Backup 
Administrator" (has SeBackup/RestorePrivilege but is not member of local 
admin group).

This change for my patch uses shell builtins for the string matching:

  # Set PS1a if user has admin rights
  unset PS1a
-if [ -r /proc/registry/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SECURITY ]; then
-  PS1a="# "
-fi
+case " $(/usr/bin/id -G) " in
+  *\ 544\ *) PS1a="# " ;;
+esac

Works for me with bash, dash, mksh, posh, and zsh.

Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -