X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=piC/174FPzc3xBagN96JnV+XI4zPVV5u86YsNsYlvVP
	XDhwSu+UUmXe3fjtqc84wb/JWxOzCXVVIZ/JLf17SP4/+N1kSTjpv1fWITmmw0yE
	nRBh6G9oNwXMSo0/L1HVN5AOV8USikyowEt71mIf7+VSKEyyCJW0X7OfoU+yHb7w
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=od905kttrS5MqFpI+LW+CXdFwkQ=; b=O5Xk+L+eI80ziQ7YB
	zARWsjrwxSv6tcdIsfGKrDW13Jdh2mkGTRJ5AVRsVoTuESlJtbRc5AhG9BN6uxmX
	sOamhkFHwQ9eS9+a+XxCxMRDSuAKS/I6nKS02yp86Uwvu3KW5eK0jVRNsM4ayl72
	vbCZvaYXIyNFG750Vq6EQ8iaGE=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mailout06.t-online.de
Message-ID:	<5345C0C0.5010908@t-online.de>
Date:	Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:50:56 +0200
From:	Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] base-files-4.2-1: Change prompt if running with admin rights
References:	<53458036 DOT 1010307 AT t-online DOT de> <877g6ys69r DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To:	<877g6ys69r.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Achim Gratz wrote:
> Christian Franke writes:
>> Attached is an updated version of:
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00806.html
> I'll put this on hold until the AD integration has landed in Cygwin
> (which will require some larger changes anyway).

Agree.

> Generally I'd prefer to move such things that depend on personal
> preferences like setting up prompts into profile.d where they are easier
> to change and maintain independently from core system functionality.

The user could disable the root prompt by an "unset PS1a" in a profile.d 
script. The default behavior of Cygwin should IMO be close to 
traditional *nix behavior: Use a special (#) prompt if root(-like) 
privileges are effective.


> Using the registry to check for administrative privileges is clever,
> however I'm wondering why we shouldn't simply check via id (that's what
> I'm doing personally at the moment).

For standard local administrator users, both would work to check for 
privilege elevation.

I used the registry check in the past because it only uses shell 
builtins and does not rely on specific SID->gid mappings in /etc/group.

Christian


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -