X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=f3H4XCtkVu7DM0gUz8YG7H+Nwapl8IxC/Mg47q9VlvO0axmvClETJ
	3b3aF7TmVHc1Ga0Q5dM8bwTOf0LZ1/HEdjPiOXMRloLKcoHcGJD/giiY16BvKC48
	J7zu625vJKuI+qhv3+obo3iirXVcNjvazorwFC9YrhHYoX/i46sNJc=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=3JSNPXnXRcOLFZfcBciNVwbA8wE=; b=XT9cGY+sKECuusToC6w9p00GC4ol
	PQvL4+kyv9sI6ca5D+lFjBdizHHYy261mLTCs1aPA3ADuRwGMi5bvrKb+CbfhEqw
	pU0gGAIO1eGUism3I0TbRGJ23H50mcWdA/19DbYO8ECAUqm1z6WkSnrl50joH+Kr
	wi2M+RFsxywleR8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX19H+hfNqdVHdUq3pek15oaU
Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:00:04 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin kill utility //Was: cgwin_internal(): difference b/w CW_CYGWIN_PID_TO_WINPID and CW_GETPINFO_FULL for taking only dwProcessId ?
Message-ID:	<20140408180004.GC2731@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8AED9C AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408031817 DOT GA1796 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B4372 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408090129 DOT GC28755 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA2464FF5 AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B85C2 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408152118 DOT GB4595 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5344236E DOT 8020503 AT aol DOT com> <20140408164902 DOT GD5812 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140408174626 DOT GJ2437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20140408174626.GJ2437@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:46:26PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>What he says.
>
>And just if it's still not clear, despite the fact that WJM, we would
>*love* to get more patches.  It doesn't mean your patch will go in
>without scrutinizing and maybe we ask for changes, but we're always open
>to bug fixes and cool new functionality, as long as it's POSIXy (or
>Linuxy in case they differ).

Just an added clarification: Lack of patches may result in hilarious
Thursday/feline comments from me.

gf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -