X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=
	jVFwrlbS3iSh23qqsM9Pym/d2UFItWPR6FpcjuUUpuukqXMGNkTlIcxHOSGrwk9Z
	INoYA2vaGd8T0iepxMyuvUMCZtS7gIwCBD42orBxIBnj7MJSBMdkrCMmhvIlkVuo
	AtDhSXX4fjW/ibJGJpAz3u3Oj4ezsyLZ/9555a3Xihk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; s=default; bh=OWzxV
	frZ9/LCX8eOOdoStMdanGQ=; b=dl1ErFpIWGHGon7rhFiAhUEYNG+uFAcU5VQo6
	ZnA+8+7tCsHUFuF8QIG+FUjKkng5hZGxv3ILkXx5A+fCVBzkYeyKZh0X3jQHdEoN
	FrI7HXzF28qMF6d8fp8MBEYdQK70fvzeHYb51JcMZWZkVbX/9AtK9eRYJpOpF6Rn
	bVhjbI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-we0-f170.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.161.168 with SMTP id xt8mr40853677wjb.35.1396856979411; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<6BA0E670DE2A4416BB5A12250B427E5A@OwnerPC311012>
References:	<CABKp57PdLMKqmGFhfMEN4BLPFcndkpibora5yx2Xdy6zh4+WzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6BA0E670DE2A4416BB5A12250B427E5A AT OwnerPC311012>
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:49:39 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEhDDbC0YCy7p_k-vgyVgOgn-=+pF_8jUr1JB3rkHT2+5Z4U8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: long_int vs int byte sizes
From:	Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	Joseph Maxwell <discard36 AT gmail DOT com>

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:35 AM,  Rob wrote:

> I think so. I've not yet struck a case on Windows where either int or long
> are not 4 bytes. (Haven't tried Cygwin64.)

Obviously you never used a 16-bit compiler :)
(where int is 16 bits and long is 32 bits usually)

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -