X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=iPwc8GAv8feZ1fTW1WtUahQFzEcX6wYow3iXpGqLFj3ZjRgwU4xcc
	IT8gBuM0unuoc65Bw0QxIIaYeF+h2IVFRPOqvnL/rl9figcbqeX+Rbo2K8jSHo2I
	fxKD1mU98PKXiRDlfUj68VkmBkdIHH3izFIDwIVv1vDzBj88Xt0pg8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=5t0Ji1gv5VP4x9pUycOWcYWc2bU=; b=Sr+3WTIVc3ks1UyuDL8xxMETeB7Z
	5ne4KNPedzWuT6/UxqH/4kgsScwWdc+GUFZjRSphYm4obG+bITV4YK9oCOWi4b9M
	+hPGwUYqq22l9hBGtiVyGOW0w3igeGDFPPgH6fagYSsOpetMmOk5wr12Gc6FojvU
	3a8mmdCK/m6t11o=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:34:47 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin needs a man-db port
Message-ID:	<20140314163447.GC2355@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5241EF7D DOT 9080309 AT xs4all DOT nl> <52433E7A DOT 4070600 AT xs4all DOT nl> <524341E5 DOT 6080601 AT xs4all DOT nl> <5322EA04 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl> <5322FCE8 DOT 50604 AT breisch DOT org> <53230EBB DOT 5050500 AT xs4all DOT nl> <5323112A DOT 8080200 AT breisch DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5323112A.8080200@breisch.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 14 10:24, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> Erwin Waterlander wrote:
> >Op 14-3-2014 13:58 Chris J. Breisch schreef:
> >>
> >>
> >>There's also a check 0.9.12 from January of this year.
> >>
> >>It appears to me that we should upgrade check to at least 0.9.11, as
> >>I'm unconvinced that the current version is working.
> >>
> >
> >It was in October when I tried. I also could get libpipelines and man-db
> >compiled, but it did not work properly. I had also failing tests in the
> >libpipeline package. In the end I could display a man page in Russian
> >and English of Vim, but man-db coredumped on the Fench man page.
> >
> >I remember there were indeed problems with 'check'. At that time this
> >bug, http://sourceforge.net/p/check/bugs/88/, was still open. The author
> >of man-db suggested to set CK_FORK=3Dno in the environment. That helped
> >for several tests, but the first test of libpipelines kept failing.
> >
> >I also had a problem that I always got static libraries instead of share=
d.
> >Even when I explicitly configure with --enable-static=3Dno
> >--enable-shared=3Dyes.
> >
> >regards,
> >
> I downloaded and built the latest version of check, and it seems to
> work much better. I still have issues with libpipelines tests. It
> appears that there is a 32/64-bit issue somewhere. I'm using Cygwin
> x64. Many of the tests fail with issues similar to the following:
>=20
> /home/Chris/Stuff/non-GNU/libpipeline/build/tests/../../libpipeline-1.2.6=
/tests/exec.c:114:(.text+0x121):
> relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol
> `_ck_assert_failed'

The "relocation truncated to fit" gcc error message on 64 bit systems is
a red herring.  It's in fact just what it says, there's an undefined
symbol.  Off the top of my head I don't know where ck_assert_failed is
defined, probably some library, but the leading underscore is suspicious.
The 64 bit ABI does not prepend underscores to symbol names as the 32
bit ABI does.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=f8/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7--

- Raw text -