X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=THmEha1gDeR8qfaUOsU13mlhUYzdVfFVr8Av0ICauDi
	g+La6PcAKNKwhm+CTwpjHPYhJpoZkh1qXVBZMwVlCbgYvTlEyCoGnoMQmpbLv08n
	R0nBCDn5DkU2TGAHmQJhh+Upf0fX1iQ7anQN5TAKi0MNmKUYIsUjaOlOh0nOU1F4
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=O8n6yNYAekZebOGThgAeEfgQtCI=; b=XIJgf7fTqgwmshXdb
	ohU+LDI39GHWwcV6OPtVx21A6t5BKnPat61/V3bt1IHyYaWHVnL56OUC8J3hpJKP
	oK8I0KjgdYzu6+KU7W7l+k08SVudJaxjVzln6pMl3mnbsRyY2j9/g/jydi/Uhc+8
	m++AgRDW0+yOKgVDF+/Ps/7esM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-ie0-f171.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.50.56.109 with SMTP id z13mr3228702igp.6.1394732774687; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<5321EEE9.6050009@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 12:46:17 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Compiled executables requiring admin rights - different results between MinGW host type
References:	<E29840B52F804D728672875F0A8D534E AT TKsamsung> <20140312184136 DOT GB2547 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20140312184136.GB2547@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 2014-03-12 13:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Our maintainers of the mingw-binutls and native binutils package just
> have to update the packages to the latest from binutils git.  Actually,
> that reminds me...
>
> JonY, ping?  A couple of days ago, Nick Clifton updated binutils for
> Windows so that every executable, which doesn't provide its own
> manifest, will get a default manifest.
[snip]
> So, if you have a bit of time, it would be nice to get new
> mingw64-i686-binutils and mingw64-x86_64-binutils packages (as well
> as a new Cygwin binutils, but cgf already knows about this).

Not to mention a new cygwin*-binutils for Cygwin and Fedora.  cgf, are 
you carrying any patches on top of today's 2.24.51 snapshot?

Once all the PE-target binutils are updated, I can rip out all the 
manifest-generation code in cygport, right?

> Every time a new Windows version is released, we will have to update the
> default manifest in binutils, too, but that's the price we have to pay
> for compatibility.  Sigh.

A mass rebuild every few years wouldn't hurt; I'd say we're actually 
overdue for one on x86.


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -