delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2014/03/06/07:43:07

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=UL/y9gteBYEm0AOX
r61HeuP4FYv9qHJ2nArFfcWzj+nuxq+9eU71zKRNHocwfO9HEjRbaCpbKSb1TDrq
ZNcRq0iTZhjGwUOPkAtfttY+vlJ319CJ3UztB30IflALI60TJV5N2gyiScMmNZCx
0dGftdzjpeuATiN9wF1ob5+ksUs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=IT1ppPlGet9gmYDCxurbnX
kF8cM=; b=OB9M9z2hi5m+0ggiqdbDDn+H+jaanrEUtwMo51SGw9qvYFdBOvjSQK
NJn9F+izn7mL9GRA/vU9J/TR3YMyPcah5ng4MPLQaMaBPBQl5k7WyuhPrwZ9+F4k
RBuj4VD+stOyiIigRmXfu/OWq3N1rLvyP/dLWA16CbdlwG3LCDwgw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: csmail.cs.umass.edu
Message-ID: <53186D47.1030709@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:42:47 -0500
From: Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: bash adds dot to $PATH (was: Re: $PATH contains dot but unclear where it comes from)
References: <CAM9pMnPHk+78886DU86tKY6HmOQQUsZLFQk2XoOCMR-aVcUvwg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9pMnPHk+78886DU86tKY6HmOQQUsZLFQk2XoOCMR-aVcUvwg@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

If it is of any use, the versions I have installed,
bash/sh 4.1.10(4), have the same length and differ
in two byte positions, by one bit in each case.

These differences may just reflect the different
name or a slightly different time at which the .exe
was constructed as part of a build process.  I suspect
that bash is acting differently based on the name via
which it was called and that the executable is really
the same in both cases.  On a true linux system they
might be the same file, accessed via a hard link.

The behavioral difference presumably could be traced
down in the source code to bash.  I have no idea how hard
or subtle that may be.  It might be a question that
upstream maintainers could answer.  I suppose it could
still be some kind of very subtle interaction between
bash/sh and cygwin, but you'd need to narrow down to
particular library or system calls.

I can't recall if you have tried using strace to trace
system calls of the two invocations to see if you can
find a difference there.  I am not sure what you would
look for or if it would even show up in a syscall trace ...

Regards -- Eliot

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019