X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=m1C8atDjTKq3p9Rp
	WJZ+gM3E+OhjDOYk7o4CHPXRXDNiD6zLGLGCjPimzBPzQ5ATjc1ot0/OrKt/SKPg
	Dvb/lj22D9SYR9TqPKL3UcN9H84JmagVLLpmJOi5kx6Bx1ioNVIsIQDCDkfY4bfe
	q2IXt9lH9FfI/ifGnzLd3c9CcBI=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=FoNhOr+nXC03mnZCsrKtIN
	xymh8=; b=Jbbtt4ukew5QDYWue9CCKxXG0Faw+VoeUf0PZaXD/Id6rJQT5lkoSi
	JT8AyZgq0HkergWmCLkktTW7JqLQyXycfUMHxZQmxp3XCS7W6Qifj2tUyVkqfrSK
	JzrW6XLKP+sKhm/ji/lGcR7hMBN9AVPndgUWiZCx5l5BhAIFNePNo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:47:01 +0400
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<231682974.20140303184701@yandex.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<20140303092352.GB26619@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20140226100209 DOT GR2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140226135222 DOT GW2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140227T095414-414 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20140227T100638-8 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227094951 DOT GD2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140227T134714-188 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227134632 DOT GG2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <765945729 DOT 20140228031219 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140228120748 DOT GN2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1244251265 DOT 20140301020854 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140303092352 DOT GB26619 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> > I've just uploaded a new snapshot to http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>> 
>> I've sent a reply with testing details, but it may have been caught by SPAM
>> deflection for "excess use of foreign language".
>> Please disregard this notification, if a message will finally come through.
>> 
>> > Please try it out.  Average timings from your environment (process
>> > startup, and calling `id') would be nice.
>> 
>> Oh, and I thought of a way to test only invocation times.
>> I ran /bin/true alot...
>> 
>> db_cache: no
>> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,75
>> Stable (+-0.2 regardless of current credentials.)
>> 
>> db_cache: yes
>> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,85 (current user)
>> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,75 (different user)
>> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.10 in both cases.)
>> 
>> Default caching settings.
>> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:01,15
>> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.15 or more in all cases.)

> So the process start takes 0.3 secs extra for you.  Is that feasible?
> Would you rather keep the new "db_cache" setting as an option?  What
> do you think is the best default, objectively spoken?

I could never notice it. And it's not 0.3 sec, it's closer to 0.005sec (the
cycle was run about sixty times, so, divide approptely)
I'd need to test it in domain environment, but I don't have access to one with
Cygwin installed right now. Or, perhaps, I do?... let me check something.

In the meantime, I see my previous mail was indeed caught in the middle. I'll
repost it with a link to test results.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 03.03.2014, <18:41>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -