X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=XJbm4
	j9Ztrbexw+Q9zDxp4MQ/wdUtynD01Mqm2d7wnPzHNLQ6qGms01H1YgHalbZ/nNT4
	Mih4oTUGbqf0URJ7n2CUTF9c99RhekT8Ud5Dw/ft9YCX0ZgAYE87bnWSlSj/pOV1
	Gp3YJ5Dv6EbTzNyjLsrVlvHlLh3rXrGmkPbxkU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=gWpu42kOu61
	Au+81PIjXdjRoGC0=; b=NM1hycOfWdC2yz5AAvgwzQmjsm8ByyiQELcg5/x8WpY
	k8ajm9h4Dn8Bk10g7VIz8AzjjPJ8pLX+tB3PXH93ijEUBjntfRWYutr6OhqaapG2
	OkuNnzJyaPN0/MTtpOC0ueTTgWhC0H5VYLc1J/WGC9dNtTnxkyiWbrbQa0eTodzo
	=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-in-07.arcor-online.net
X-DKIM:	Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-08.arcor-online.net 666473AF816
From:	Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
References:	<20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87fvn7cb68 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20140225200414 DOT GA4238 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87y50zaqjb DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20140225215423 DOT GA6065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140226T085959-119 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140226100209 DOT GR2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140226135222 DOT GW2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140227T095414-414 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20140227T100638-8 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227094951 DOT GD2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:45:56 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<20140227094951.GD2246@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:49:51 +0100")
Message-ID:	<8738j3dyvf.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version:	1.0

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> 1 second?  That sounds still a bit slow.

It appears that that there are multiple DC involved, either via
delegation or redirection (as I've managed to get some partial group
resolutions where groups from a particular domain were absent).  So all
this slowness probably has to do with roundtrip times.  Based on that
hypothesis I've done the same test again via DSL/VPN and got this:

1:49 stock-cvs
1:15 getgroups
0:13 noldap

The times don't change all that much whether I've clogged the DSL
connection or not, so the size of the response doesn't seem to be a
major factor here.

> Still, it seems like the right thing to do to drop the group name
> configuration stuff entirely.

Indeed.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -