X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=AzXH3KRDGfo49RgtlA1Z7mqnmF3GMdt4+rx4mSDcWb6KMEuvoSm8T
	4KOP2Clh46gXLvuihfNUF9UeeRWkTfiVUS7u6+h9zAKR7223ufvE4VF9m+XyRyrn
	NWjrsUoI6m3f8AS7S08ZtS/jMkJOej5e/PEymwy91oz169+XfIOmGU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=gqQE0Fb787ciWFZftscWJ+BhJjI=; b=LMN762MUYVQjGjTUo7mJqVhMsBMO
	Okh7Uj4FTkALT3hvkfrNWFF5lRpznZHPQZsGI1jVDw+f0tBLcpm7nImO8oxLqwQ4
	FifSUxWKnnML0C5bjaMQA1vW5FLCNJoycLMwE7tWDjXaxLbuC87n9Ielb1Xea3X0
	HnI6ttx2Z3EPbfg=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:09:43 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
Message-ID:	<20140228120943.GA31018@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAKf2h5SUDAe6b3Z333w5nagXZbTZ1V3K4BKnGq-MmAU+VR77QA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140227193832 DOT GJ2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20140227193832.GJ2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 27 20:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 27 20:06, Frank Fesevur wrote:
> > 2014-02-13 15:38 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen:
> > > This is a pretty intrusive change, in need of some serious testing, so
> > > I'd like to ask for volunteers.  The latest 2014-02-13 snapshot from
> > > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains the changes, including the late=
st
> > > bugfix.
> >=20
> > I noticed another thing. Not sure if I would call it a problem, just
> > an observation or if it is a feature.
> >=20
> > As said before, my laptop is part of a domain and I have moved the
> > local passwd and group out of the way.
> >=20
> > When I am not connected to the domain (on the road) I get this error
> > every time I start mintty: "id: kan geen naam vinden bij groeps-ID
> > 1049089"
>=20
> My dutch is a bit rusty but this text is obvious.  And unexpected.
> What was supposed to happen is this:
>=20
> - LookupAccountSid returns with error
>   =3D=3D> Check if the local machine knows the domain name of the SID
>   =3D=3D> Yes: Create a fake group name "DOMAIN+RID"
>       No:  Create a fake group name "Unknown_Group+GID"
> [...]
> > The reason for the message seems obvious. The process can't lookup the
> > information. But it can be confusing to users to see an error at
> > startup. Is it error useful to the user? Can I suppress this message?
>=20
> No, because it comes from `id', not from Cygwin, and as I wrote
> above, it's in fact unexpected and unwanted.  Could you try to
> strace this scenario?  Maybe I can figure out why the account name
> faking didn't work.

Never mind that, I could easily reproduce the issue.  Please try the
latest snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/.  It's supposed to fix
this issue.  It also introduces another new behaviour as outlined in

  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-02/msg00735.html

Note that "db_cache: full" is the default for now so the new feature
gets a bit more testing.  The former default would have been equivalent
to "db_cache: yes".


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=6cm7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--

- Raw text -