X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=QiRC2lMWpfnBeoljm2Rv0aJuBanhIRMx/LIIQOOEW+r7Ehki4HzXP
	7F5uMbe4yX3k4kNLBYgGTHheJF5XZW8MZfQv58ktv7gV7W7MAZAERtfRpMMUWxxn
	l1KmuOSoSjq1qSsyQMkDtaMT75HXWa5sGi12N/77kNgt2ypzscy8W0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=bI+ZK2PEwuOLxtTCo66DdlZEv3U=; b=Gv54qvEkblV5DPwrG4IhizIpnx9p
	tz048E5OzSsljN0pIfiZPb44mbPSqIguxAxsk2XRh5sfvgoNKTa8UPSb1c/4nmwM
	HcyuPPVWN03fzvFVq1nXMra4gc6OBiVLR7VDmVTA9M9S1Q+MJOJOBZK4koq6Cc4F
	++AwCQ77de3RsYA=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:58:36 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field?
Message-ID:	<20140227095836.GE2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<530D261C DOT 5000403 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530D2932 DOT 5010906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140226100712 DOT GS2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530E7E8A DOT 1070303 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530E80E7 DOT 6060201 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530E83DC DOT 9090109 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20140227002659 DOT GA5186 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140227002936 DOT GB5186 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <530E8AA9 DOT 7080502 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530EE48E DOT 7080903 AT arcor DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<530EE48E.7080903@arcor.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--TbqbGUYwJfHHaS/d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 27 08:09, Dirk Fassbender wrote:
> Am 27.02.2014 01:45, schrieb Jim Burwell:
> >On 2/26/2014 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>The common case would be for a shell to show up in /etc/shells.  Under
> >>>Fedora adds the shell to /etc/shells when the shell package is
> >>>installed.  I don't see any reason for us to do anything different.
> >>Rephrasing that in English:
> >>
> >>Under Fedora, shells add themselves to /etc/shells file when they are
> >>installed.
> >>
> >>cgf
> >>
> >>--
> >>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> >>
> >Yep.  At least for common shells.  If someone is super security
> >conscious, they can police their /etc/shells file.  But the most common
> >usage would be to simply allow a shell that's installed, since if a
> >person installed a shell, you can safely presume they want to use it.
> >
> >--
> >Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> >FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> >Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> One remark about /etc/shells
> The inetutils and inetutils-server packages comes with a file
> /etc/defaults/etc/shells
> and the postinstall scripts installs these file into /etc/shells.

Good hint.  That's where I remember /etc/shells from.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--TbqbGUYwJfHHaS/d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2aHh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TbqbGUYwJfHHaS/d--

- Raw text -