X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=g+j
	zAJNwOtQhrUhX2GFmghhe2O0WmVKhI+kad11VmjIJ1zF0wxCXQblreeTXHYSVGbC
	yl/cC79+KPSqFPsmzwZkbJca52G9ATcQMnrHKdtC+QfCaDCaxOOBQhPDhJVQODIe
	CJPZf9v2gJta4FWz/dyGriDs2zHs/AtlGKBl6los=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=tfryVIAdw
	IMOhOWrAsSAbLML9C8=; b=h6oWPI7E3cs9l5DDLCPqgEpZZnf0KhZtlhgS4gTKO
	qutBh+HzjziaCdtciKdTV73BsA8bmPZSM88y9fpmwalOJ74fTP3FcDzCH2rHeVbF
	3wUJCi0jqJa26wxTQ3f2eJaUlNUSOW80G0MRm7+ReFvCv7yh9ESckgWOwBbCdug4
	x4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl
Message-ID:	<83452de9778f617449b61266b2dc0c79.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 19:58:09 +0100
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
From:	"J.H. vd Water" <henri DOT van DOT de DOT water AT xs4all DOT nl>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	SquirrelMail/1.4.18
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi Corinna,

>> However, as you know, the supplementary group to which I referred above do NOT show
>> up in my /etc/group file on Cygwin (they show up in SAM ... somewhere).
>>
>> ... and I do not care, as these groups are NOT relevant to me as a Cygwin-only user
>> of the Windows operating system (using passwd and group files).
>
>If you only want to use the content of your passwd and group files,
>rather than the db (which is pretty much upside down from what this
>patch is trying to accomplish, but, anyway), simply change your
>/etc/nsswitch.conf file accordingly.  Just as on Linux.

:-) My /etc/nsswitch.conf file ALREADY specifies 'db_enum: files'.

However, as you probably aware of, the output of 'id' _still_ shows all
the (non-file ;-) supplementary groups I do not care about ...

That is what I tried to make clear with my message. No more.

Henri



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -