X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=t1pZ+lud4t226AoI
	zfhmNcp16Boj8VW4hMus2nRLF44D+bO7cXzn94dsEPKmdx9iPS6lqNa5yQajSinT
	OqTXPk66MGquKOUD0f8VmB4qgmAXw4Ki6paLpSswK6oeu62wvZ6CY3egWFabnvTL
	C2pUcc4CzBirwPnmV+1CLBVyN2Y=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=WcOzeriG58JogeCLW6+ctH
	6uvvQ=; b=GPRKi4NdWbBAct7gT2XLJ5RSxzhDBFp4ZvuR0kXYMTNfC2wu8/+dsu
	JkD3QbaZ95Km7UrXP5ru7mlHiUwmeNd3qv8nVYJIaKjcDC2EkcIKqorTlt+zt+mn
	dEQZH4KX9Tq3Jh9r3RmCK/gz0hGIUYyfuCHDoiMgpWnz4esPL7Plk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:19:16 +0400
From:	Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<1268935237.20140219231916@yandex.ru>
To:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<20140219184830.GX2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140217162152 DOT GA17278 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1574274407 DOT 20140219185602 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140219184830 DOT GX2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> Setting
>> 
>> db_enum: local
>> 
>> seems to be really destructive.
>> I'm not good at reading straces, so... Can I make a useful trace for your
>> inspection?
>> So far, I'm unable to start anything with freshly rebuilt Cygwin1.dll
>> if db_enum set to local. Even uname -a crashes.

> The last one is weird since uname doesn't call getpwent.

That's what was my thought, too. Because (un)setting it back cures the crash.

> Anyway, with more help from Denis Excoffier I think I got it.  I'm
> just building a new snapshot which should be up in half an hour or so.
> Please give it a try.

Looking into it now.
Doesn't crash or anything so far. (With `db_enum: local' set.)
Tried a few utilities, as well as your example get*ent code.
BTW, can we have it as one "getent"[1] tool for the next release?

Going to play with different settings, I will post if I find anything
unexpected.

[1] http://linux.die.net/man/1/getent


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 19.02.2014, <23:11>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -