X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=KpR
	zFclfL+dG6RALeDZmI8UKLEyZAYjuIC4U9eRCIessfMMGiKAmXtJnhx6+/jqw2HD
	jixAYggojczY8nrGR4x5AQz5Cu2JkTp5nau7pDlog+e6kdjm1oWJv/L7//OlMsPh
	hQTAPhxtIYsfqAmL6TX2dDfodWeVxjkTTiHXkfsE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=IfMmOK+YD
	27SNpgRC5r5Ad8QI08=; b=Wk/+Tl9ynXuMuUlTNBFXk8ZaS0y0JUbySB6ZUGURB
	ztejnsTkU+cylLuz17oOdL07ulbf+/z4rdyBzynd9xTNi6d9aZcquw4Om9qkgSJH
	AXuqZljeqUZ5tYIzOFafv5zWIqc/Oq0xzcxfCJ6qRnNQalD17sdwMiIVU277CnXg
	1Y=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl
Message-ID:	<50d82a8f1a79bf80e57e32d94078227e.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:01:58 +0100
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
From:	"J.H. vd Water" <henri DOT van DOT de DOT water AT xs4all DOT nl>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	SquirrelMail/1.4.18
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi Corinna,

(Sorry, have't found time to properly subscribe to the list, yet)

>> Both cases show the same output:
>>
>> $ ./lsa
>> pdom name: <WORKGROUP> dnsname: <(null)>, sid: 0x0
>> adom name: <XP> sid: 0x246058

I "lied" here :-) The non-admin case showed: ... sid: 0x246060
(So, almost the same)

>Huh.  This looks entirely normal and expected.  Which makes the
>SEGV even more weird.  I'm apparently missing something here.
>
>> Perhaps, it is best to stop here for the moment ... There must be more pressing
>> things on your list.
>
>No, there aren't.  This testing is very important.  I'd like to
>have such crashes like yours fixed before this new code gets
>released.

>> Moreover, I already decided to use 'db_enum: files' in /etc/nssswitch.conf (and
>> XP is a thing of the past, is it not?).

But who will still be using XP within a company after after april 2014?'. So, does
have XP priority? Your decision, of course ...

>I'm going to make some tests on XP, but if I can't track this down,
>would you mind if I send you a test Cygwin DLL with extended debug
>output to help tracking it down?

The best thing to do, I believe, if you want to fix 'XP' (my machine may turn out
to be a "misfit").

However, I have started afresh with the 18/2 snapshot ...

Same result: getpwent crashed (db_enum: local) ... getgrent is ok.

Send me a cygwin1.dll? Ok, if you tell me how to handle the thing (i.e. include
some pointers to documents that I must read in order to be able to get results).

Henri


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -