X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=JA0
	MxKjhyWz4Ln0xZ0HBDcQgxBoRl/9gylcTGunQF37BvbBoeHO4x0WUbDAsD/IsNFV
	UXhBwXqk7pyIBWL+uFzx2NhucWEt8whret5iy8wmnXGq7JKJfIswNfQ5lZESXdgJ
	LKYzNbSh4jAEV8Q6FkLTCXu7MoLtVN3Yf9/anrL0=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=152RgHovQ
	BhvBkwfV3Kff1LOF1E=; b=yB7ppPXu4C7Q8gBoU+4GvL87a0XxotybNRPF4lKyk
	42PbmSd3F0TEw5fd2NDtrcHAOxUGkO0vLrMbTMx44YMtTLe9xMBJG7Lwj1PcKFkS
	kqsfrL2l+lu1CpyZvU8hNSclyZcl0mwvunKKc7gh0gENw2iRWmDBtNeskHdsC18Y
	1s=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl
Message-ID:	<7f134d1561781b92212eb45350009593.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:44:29 +0100
Subject:	Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
From:	"J.H. vd Water" <henri DOT van DOT de DOT water AT xs4all DOT nl>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	SquirrelMail/1.4.18
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi Corinna,

>> After I had set up /etc/nsswitch.conf as follows
>>
>> db_enum: files
>>
>> the output of getpwent and getgrent looked "familiar" to me. (though the
>> output of 'id' is not).
>
>In how far?  Did you read my text in terms of how user and group names
>are created?  The leading separator char for builtin groups is an SFU

Read and understand your text completely? No.

>thingy.  If it's too disturbing we can discuss changing that, but right
>now I'm still looking for some kind of similarity.

What I meant was:

The output of 'id' in my "regular setup" shows:

@@# id
uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),0(root),544(Administrators),545(Users)

The output of 'id' in the "test setup" shows:

$ id
uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),0(root),545(Users),4(+INTERACTIVE),\
11(+AuthenticatedUsers),4095CurrentSession),66048(+LOCAL)

To me the second output is different - but perhaps it is not.

Henri




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -