X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=OxDaOsTsmszCKcS2
	zutLovvzi7tthl2+S6wCYTCuJI2YkBaXSlAkJEot5Gjutp4j2mEbPWkodvyO70NB
	cGvo/1VYM8pDtoppyMfzLylrVPyhx7/j3js7PzCnVKArwmoVqy+NTea8MUQCEJkv
	jYsaJ08JNH+j7LCjTtdaA/4Biew=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=/adMVlWRr3kkrm0egDrcva
	3TPeI=; b=Dq8f9iXB8XO+mI822zKIb0H1EHVjXUaEf2dGqW+/ZL9T3qXWROap3O
	h1OX4xw9a07ATMCyvQnVqFt+K4AyvlI558jCg4ekcBYawQZK5C94bKHcnQ8V1qdq
	BKysSMj6GtBKuo7IjocMfq1fkYWBiWp46wtePcvW4+YnVrGyZxYBo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<530063F2.5080403@cygwin.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Feb 2014 02:08:34 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Little cygpath improvement request
References:	<111910987 DOT 20140214222230 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FE6397 DOT 5010105 AT cygwin DOT com> <187072112 DOT 20140214234339 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20140215125606 DOT GM2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1745533059 DOT 20140215225708 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <2826041 DOT 20140216062749 AT yandex DOT ru> <53004F35 DOT 4020301 AT googlemail DOT com> <1793681198 DOT 20140216102125 AT yandex DOT ru>
In-reply-to:	<1793681198.20140216102125@yandex.ru>

On 2/16/2014 1:21 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:

<snip>

> It provide no information at all in any event (be it missing argument, or
> nonexistent path (not like it's checking for existence right now... which only
> making situation more complicated)), requiring non-obvious, manually conceived
> tests to ensure that the program operates orderly.

I think you're looking for more from cygpath than it's designed to give.
Its intent is to perform direct Windows<->POSIX path conversions using the
mount table and to provide access to some system defined paths in Windows.
That's really it.  It is not meant to validate input or output.  If you have
a use case which requires that only valid paths are input to or output
from cygpath, that does need to be handled upstream or downstream.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -