delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2014/02/13/06:46:38

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:to:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=fad3j
MQQlLfZDYhQ4yBy7vEALq6NGd2CkL8p0KbkgxJVDP8KxZgDGm4gwIFa/Soj02d2u
NriTX5iGqvZs38R4gAaYb3Tdw+49R2GaD9s1ZuooDnBfJh6tLpSOC2//XRGlYazb
b31t91uZOrBDcYVnZ8e24LqOSoD+zi213o8mnc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:to:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=Ob5ebzZUVL1
Q6MemtLJQ+aA7eRM=; b=MpZk0+XrEXsHqVqoSrte7yanKpOFRC5GqsB41SAncPo
KVRHxFNgihw22tZb8A1sPOBcCrnWkF9jAaMHz58XewDKNbJkiaHz//hk3PEROp4A
swR2MPj0sW4vE7yAMK/RjVpCUGNcNoBAQJP1lnR/H8M9Isf/g1P+WO8dfGcOX7Bs
=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,T_HK_NAME_DR,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: aserp1040.oracle.com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Status of Xemacs on cygwin64. Is help needed?
References: <BLU406-EAS411D6B7EA31F10EABF43483AD920 AT phx DOT gbl> <f5btxc3mjux DOT fsf AT troutbeck DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
From: "Dr. Volker Zell" <dr DOT volker DOT zell AT oracle DOT com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:46:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <f5btxc3mjux.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk> (Henry S. Thompson's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:40:06 +0000")
Message-ID: <87iosjb5h6.fsf@VZELL-LAP.de.oracle.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (cygwin32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes

>>>>> Henry S Thompson writes:

    > Anibal Morales writes:
    >> I don't have a lot of free time but I miss my Xemacs. If I can make
    >> a difference I would like to volunteer and help release this
    >> package.... but I am a total cygwin package noob.

    > Unfortunately it isn't (just) a packaging matter.  Getting xemacs to
    > compile for 64-bit cygwin requires real work.  I started a thread on
    > this on xemacs-beta [1], but it has stalled for the time being.

    > Sorry!

    > I ended up doing a minimal 32-bit cygwin install alongside my 64-bit
    > one so that I could run xemacs. . .

Hi

I'm the maintainer of xemacs under cygwin. Unfortunately to fix this is
over my programming skills. The problem is somehow with
subprocesses. You can't use a subshell started with

M-x: shell

in xemacs. This problem appeared already when I tried to finally
recompile xemacs for cygwin32-1.7 and it still persists in cywin64.

I'm very busy right now with non-cygwin related things, so any help in
this area would be appreciated.

Ciao
  Volker

PS: I also use a minimal 32-bit cygwin install alongside my 64-bit because of xemacs

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019