delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DomainKey-Signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=ROOKZqAzBo1gQdn9svDMVG/Q+3/n | |
sI7D+43oATwYhS4J2P4ZVJFZfbzw4ocyHAD8d+QCMyrCa1HMzWkmlKxwE0K1HOOc | |
ldaHmp19v48fM9+tL7pNDP24MjphIe0KKhcQykggQYVQbamvpnavw31uKFyk9pNv | |
eQtZFoq3QZq4s7A= | |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id |
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post | |
:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from | |
:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id | |
:references:to; s=default; bh=FW/LmC7TMway0hiLxhrzm+qpToA=; b=Jf | |
Upakn7u1SmG6HB8EGOBnUJEzIqaP+W2H60soNTJsNzaY9QiC2gBD4p1thCLJLijh | |
zOXvk1EyUY3UIRxWOhDQ1s7zawZO0C/kGfCCUFkneLmql8K2kfAiBLPhRx5Id4qP | |
O49X9Yt8hlcKmYNx5NBMe9QR76ceI5rXTl9tcSSaQ= | |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; auth=none |
X-Virus-Found: | No |
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: | No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 |
X-HELO: | tangentsoft.com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) |
Subject: | Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?) |
From: | Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <52F7AEC5.5090205@tiscali.co.uk> |
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:02:27 -0700 |
Message-Id: | <8B7B5FE0-7413-4358-BA8A-E0B6E0B17653@etr-usa.com> |
References: | <52F339CA DOT 5070305 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206090117 DOT GD2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F361C5 DOT 3000807 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206141321 DOT GI2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F40208 DOT 5030901 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140207094917 DOT GN2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F4E540 DOT 2010606 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52F51D19 DOT 6080807 AT etr-usa DOT com> <31347914-BB4F-4039-984B-731B6C72F903 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52F7AEC5 DOT 5090205 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s1A92lFh002472 |
On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:37 AM, David Stacey <drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> wrote: > On 09/02/2014 15:45, Warren Young wrote: >> Results: >> >> /bin/cppcheck.exe > > As far as I can tell, cppcheck doesn't actually call getpwent() at all; this is a false positive turned up by strings(1). Yeah, there *has* to be a better way than strings(1) to extract an EXE's list of DLL imports. The linker does it somehow... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |