X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=vP3JDnFIxqBmK3PlywEQ5DjTZfF6etCUcqproxp75t0EhcZ1Vc7Ca
	IggGtq8jKRXizJNt71T/M1RV6aehNJvyk7M7yEECtCZ8WuUqSB+JSDYlQCINRgxA
	1RVzRvgi99o4gDYHXSOeOfAMGdvoeQTidO02i0avQ6vY4K6P19kcgg=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=hnM0gSkkxNWFtWQZp2ACr+dF22U=; b=dF5kO3UCUTuIIYbEpSfe4XLF6qzO
	9+hLzBmNKn9bMeY8ZB12RtSbbk/ws/NZDQ2dtVb7U6ObiqNsJjUjCNTgOM/EQese
	Tk7E6SZPTftzSMrpT7yWI6BGLNv3bZjc3JZy931IYfvU/oxaJBXxo0suPT6dvi5z
	kQMe1sTOhewIuYY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX186YFxZmJfT3JiWkvmXpbh6
Date:	Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:10:36 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.28-2
Message-ID:	<20140210041036.GB1044@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<announce DOT 20140209203401 DOT GI2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F82AD6 DOT 5000208 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<52F82AD6.5000208@cisra.canon.com.au>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:26:46PM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
>On 02/10/2014 07:34 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The 64 bit Cygwin distribution doesn't yet come with as many packages
>> as the 32 bit version, but more packages will be available over time.
>
>You're going to be repeating that same message for some time, I reckon, 
>Corinna!  The following small idea might add some interest, show the 
>approaching tipping point, and might even motivate some people to help 
>with some 64 bit packages.  Assuming you have the number of packages 
>handy, you could replace the above wording with something like this:

I doubt that anyone has the number of packages handy.

>The 64 bit Cygwin distribution now has $num_pk_64 packages, compared
>with $num_pk_32 in the 32 bit version.

Seems like busywork for no real gain.  The package maintainers are
well aware of the fact that they need to roll out 64-bit versions
of their packages.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -