X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=VC58evelorwNbJDfae0qYERYkOBPwtTG4Kdc8w5QMmR
	gSEoQruIH/bVrsA16q2AtiqoOeRNksfGPZuNMXz0fcStk94tfcibXZNiIOcWhj2R
	t5d0u0hOXvRffe976iwuSSuolx5z1gJVxvQmS1aiJ14du4ehJuGdRW9Gzid9PmT8
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=XueyrVGxMjM/vaGJu1HNkkUWEKM=; b=hBuPJ9Y2H6xRhrkQB
	R9Ci5HEl+Steu5RIvNjjvuZ87a4saoNL452d1Ur1/QuZ/TmS/gE5QreMRE/9Za6V
	eZrVhdLL74bcMd6spgC+XxsoB8eN875NByNlF51L+D/tlFuPhd+9DD8ZzhlQeV2u
	/3iKTOwTS4SX1N9MhEIRtxgn5w=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	etr-usa.com
Message-ID:	<52F3F1B8.7030207@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:34:00 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Newbie Questions
References:	<1898639722 DOT 6893470 DOT 1391541591920 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT ptd DOT net> <52F153AE DOT 5080704 AT gmail DOT com> <52F28215 DOT 5030801 AT ptd DOT net> <52F28330 DOT 6060101 AT cygwin DOT com> <52F2AA5D DOT 4000000 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52F2AD84 DOT 1050008 AT etr-usa DOT com> <709102296 DOT 20140206020738 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52F2D9AF DOT 1060409 AT etr-usa DOT com> <11910654512 DOT 20140206050031 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52F2E214 DOT 1060403 AT etr-usa DOT com> <2810090853 DOT 20140206121352 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
In-Reply-To:	<2810090853.20140206121352@mtu-net.ru>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2/6/2014 01:13, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Warren Young!
>
>>> [C:\home\Daemon]$ bash -c ./foo.sh
>
>> That's not the same command I gave you.  -c changes how bash.exe
>> interprets the following parameter.
>
> According to `man bash', that's the correct command to execute scripts with
> bash.

Are you trolling?

$ man bash

SYNOPSIS
        bash [options] [file]

...

ARGUMENTS
        If arguments remain after option processing, and neither the -c
        nor the -s  option  has  been supplied, the first argument is
        assumed to be the name of a file containing shell commands.



In other words, bash behaves exactly as I said originally, and Windows 
Explorer isn't wrong to call Bash with just the name of a script, when 
you tell it that all *.sh open with bash.exe.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -