X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IEhVbTAnMRxSKNdJ
	DWYpcUSyrgNW0UHDHlDeWZKtJ/EL5iWM1FK8W6FRWao4aJJEUAKnx0hAG4a6If/Y
	b5aVdBoCQ//j4op0tbdKV+9X2JCG86tdlOQ4FIN+e54S1Ezb46/wmPOAfhotOsDC
	e8uGPyM6QpxcheU7hDWtB/9TjMk=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=4uzByMHWB4ZSCTk1pfK9AN
	PkfBg=; b=afa7ZPkgLJPJ669tPrmAjJwxLkU3GE/q+4vT0uXBW2L+03mic7YAwP
	n+ajdKKA5H33GSJWWw+qZS9K/1IlCkL+qypd/p5znqxrVxmXFwgMalYiJawUg3Sj
	Vof1JvU/CLGLhLpQ+y8cPK+m4BuIRZ6wLnFdUw0tsrTspThBoLSBI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173023pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<52DFEE06.4060203@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:12:54 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygcheck and literal plus sign
References:	<CAAXzdLUjc=cYva6EfZQjRArt5NQbPG3VTTGEch=kN1GEx2-fjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140122055830 DOT GB4286 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <g4bvd9549dive5dnnh81c5frnqdlbtkku2 AT 4ax DOT com> <20140122150721 DOT GA6650 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CACUHbYPafq60OB825c2Wk5TLd+Zbt4MnM0Kzd9Rm1pv3xTTSgQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<CACUHbYPafq60OB825c2Wk5TLd+Zbt4MnM0Kzd9Rm1pv3xTTSgQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/22/2014 11:05 AM, David Boyce wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> So I'll change my answer to "I don't know".
>
> How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?

May I suggest that curious folks can more directly validate workarounds
by trying them directly.  cygwin.com generally has reasonable turnaround.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -