X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=OmfV5APkm/gewcHC
	AaR/VbkxeUdEKQps/uKd7/vZ4PLiQyzLifAVQNsfXou+AtW1CK1CkPd58hDPnSDX
	yTj+yiFF5wEstsQ98Y7V8zdzMsEKZKturwdyE7KUC1irpbfhFzUXFnqtiLMTF2tn
	kNUaCR/v5UR2DpJYeQECNDAbmZM=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=mmw1S6mrbbZzASnfLJQaPB
	NrkwA=; b=vZZwTs/Z2+1J60G1rY23ZzrLhbIL7JSA8n4amM/zwUKRrkQUVyqh2P
	I0bncmCIh8FEjhI1KiYXDX9CRW9XgAKqDL9OErVOEST+r2m/3IyUZ/NuShLC6pUx
	o8aYnjidH2g7evRVw6g31qR5P4ONKfP2LC0wCeF2C1WVt0DwCOND0=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	smtpout02.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk
X-CTCH-RefID:	str=0001.0A090201.52C2DCBC.0021,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw:	score=8/97,refid=2.7.2:2013.12.31.95414:17:8.317,ip=,rules=__MOZILLA_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __HAS_FROM, __HAS_REPLYTO, __USER_AGENT, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __IN_REP_TO, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML, __URI_NO_MAILTO, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1800_1899, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, REPLYTO_FROM_DIFF_ADDY, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-CTCH-Spam:	Unknown
Message-ID:	<52C2DCC2.1010108@dronecode.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:03:30 +0000
From:	Jon TURNEY <jon DOT turney AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
CC:	fehrin2 AT gmail DOT com
Subject:	Re: Updated: xorg-server-1.14.5-1
References:	<52C1EBF4 DOT 9080303 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <52C29A21 DOT 3060001 AT gmail DOT com> <52C2CDAC DOT 5090007 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <l9ukgl$8gq$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<l9ukgl$8gq$1@ger.gmane.org>

On 31/12/2013 14:31, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> I will not send you further personal email.
> What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about
> clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server.
> The reason why i came up with xwinclip is that i was under the (possibly
> wrong) impression that xwinclip reappeared as a consequence of this
> clipboard integration deficiency.
> So the real question is: Is it true that clipboard integration is not
> fully working with the 64bit X server and if so will this change in the
> foreseeable future?

No, clipboard integration for 64-bit X server has been working since 1.14.1-2
(See [1]).

[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree-announce/2013-06/msg00001.html

> Am 31.12.2013 14:59, schrieb Jon TURNEY:
>> On 31/12/2013 10:19, Franz Fehringer wrote:
>> Firstly, do not send me personal email.
>>
>> Please read http://cygwin.com/problems.html#personal-email, particularly the
>> section starting "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a Cygwin
>> developer or package maintainer?"
>>
>>> It seems xwinclip is still needed, what are the perspectives about this?
>>
>> I don't understand what you are trying to say here.
>>
>> If you are assuming that xwinclip is normally needed, because it is provided,
>> then perhaps you should do some testing.  It is not.
>>
>> See [1] and 'man xwinclip' for more details.
>>
>> To anticipate the next question: xwinclip is provided to assist in debugging
>> clipboard integration problems, and because it is useful with the experimental
>> XtoW window manager.
>>
>> If you are reporting a bug that xwinclip is needed when it shouldn't be, then
>> more information is needed.
>>
>> [1] http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ug/using-clipboard-integration.html

-- 
Jon TURNEY
Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -