delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/12/19/15:33:24

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
q=dns; s=default; b=cVtJWVo/+PUul/jvchEFhLfQpAoeKyCCHFHAr5OG9Ug
CL7DJbeTDm/uTVUVCWDI+riPeIn8vE7oTXmghsVxmMjQfpe/z0gJGZRJ+YhbUz9g
BdTOV+6zQnLQ++Ug8kaJBtGEhHmcAJUbRFvW0RRS6U7+1CWsd1uBFPoTwBB1BI0A
=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=default; bh=n05HavR/1CZft386Vns9LWESEfg=; b=gxS/bwmNPv1tW1IAP
ET+m2v6QzadKtB+/Dj/8qRofUIFYfxx/XkKVaF8IKAdSPkBbpULzb7pHTExWSuFd
Rs7+Bq28/2ExVcNKhR9x5NBfV7EPWDd9PKYtcaKYNC7k/PLpEGdWsoHslSZ9bWWz
d620YELqZM7hGL9yQtZLFN84oQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: etr-usa.com
Message-ID: <52B357FD.1030603@etr-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:33:01 -0700
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: doc build tool 'fop' seems to be missing
References: <loom DOT 20131219T193543-593 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20131219T193543-593@post.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 12/19/2013 11:47, Mark Geisert wrote:
>
> Package Search yields no hits for "/fop$" or "/fop.exe$".

It used to be that you had to get fop from Cygwin Ports.  Now it's no 
longer in Ports, and I don't know why.  I thought Yaakov was going to 
move it to the main Cygwin package repo, due to this core dependency. 
Maybe that's in the middle of happening right now?

Apache FOP is based on Java, so it might not be too tough to get its 
Unix binary package running under Cygwin's gcj:

     https://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.1/

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019