X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=Gaqslk1zsUNnueq90Pw2u/Pf/SvLRHL72nc+zXK0qiz
	nV+2im0U4OtR+vsI8V65wr6NJZQ7CYRqF16/9yn/HTxQjKx71Zjw+kWekWH/1fBH
	rPyOkYwJg4WKVPg/Zj+kgamKyq/zyVX1AOnT6RQ00Jg8Fl1IU9/5Vg1ErPbcCcRs
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=pMdr9Vif7Zihfun8GnCDuRzYy5g=; b=jg2BbIJFDv8QaKQCc
	cCbHOtzk4Oe4x6T3cqfr7yyaxLB4OAxJQvRzzdkEdDmClB6p2ZsUOO23Kl9YLS4G
	C84iW7cyjUc4oAyZyc3xQrc44aS8k93PEH4mZ8fAoyy5Hh1ehjgRRMJz5JgFVSoS
	QTfTt1Se9X/f+Pnv6y9+HrE8gY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
Message-ID:	<5294CF95.8070705@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:43:01 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: CVS version difference, 32-bit vs 64-bit
References:	<A4BDD8E3859F92478F09D5AACD6D79C095717853 AT welwexmb01 DOT niwa DOT local>
In-Reply-To:	<A4BDD8E3859F92478F09D5AACD6D79C095717853@welwexmb01.niwa.local>

On 11/25/2013 10:11 PM, Mark Hadfield wrote:
> On 32-bit Cygwin the CVS package is at version 1.12.13 whereas on
> 64-bit Cygwin it is at 1.11.23. The latter can handle proxy servers
> whereas the former cannot, so I would prefer 1.12.13 on both.
>
> I note that 1.11.23 (the last stable release) is quite a lot *newer*
> than 1.12.13 (the last feature release), see:
>
> http://ftp.gnu.org/non-gnu/cvs/source/stable/
> http://ftp.gnu.org/non-gnu/cvs/source/feature/
>
> So I can see there could be different views about which is best to
> distribute for Cygwin, however the proxy server consideration trumps
> everything else for me.

In order to bootstrap the 64bit cygwin environment, many times packages 
were NMU'ed (non-maintainer-upload) when the primary maintainer didn't 
have time (or was unavailable) to address the 64bit port in a timely manner.

This is/was the case for many of "my" packages, including CVS.

However, sometimes the NMU uploader chose a different package version 
for the 64bit NMU than was used for the "main" 32bit distro.  This is 
the case for CVS.

I'm veerrrrryyyy sloooowly working my way through all of my packages, 
and will get to CVS in due course.  I'm glad you were able to build a 
suitable version yourself.

--
Chuck


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -