X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=iJPRnxbVjBSLsBLuDjb+QJzxnKM62xrjNS5Ql/QNueA
	quDWJ8Gi+6Wnf1QA9xVBhweMinVyEwhCH4hiaGFuzbbCVbMwi5fVxgEdVVyuI1jk
	ffbJdc6wyS8HPWDJVFw70clB9V2uWEEKr3mdHeDh/I1EH8GwxF1ak1EABsqvwI3o
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=sXqg2SKYlw/pu3t4lKMdQ+77rWs=; b=ZDCHEiX6jRwBThn17
	QEIziy1hxOx/Z616lnRlrgrU9VlKykE+KDEweHKPYgo6xdmv4kcLzJ5lJxfL5Vfq
	GZZvSOQOiIZhPT4q/mThB338vQ8Uyms1EhAjOUYOyJka59YLN90lPWh8iGlBHAkW
	gzgHwq0S2YO6xkCT6cqXCLaFmY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
Message-ID:	<528BAC3D.9070506@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:21:49 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64
References:	<1384839303 DOT 14356 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web125203 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20131119100343 DOT GA27525 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528B93E6 DOT 3030802 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131119171330 DOT GF2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20131119171330.GF2936@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like
> GetVersionEx?  It returns different OS version numbers based on the
> existence of a manifest in the executable.  How dense is that?
>
> So we have thousands of executables, none of them has a 8.1 manifest.
> As a result, the uname() function returns OS versions 6.2 rather than
> 6.3.  Aaaaaargh.
>
> In cygcheck I added a patch to check dwBuildNumber this morning.  If
> it's >= 9200, it's 8.1/2012R2, otherwise 8/2012.  But that doesn't
> fix the OS version number of course.  Sigh.
>
> I'm going to tweak the OS version number and I'll do the same in
> Cygwin's uname function as well.

Good grief. I suppose I need to add something similar to 
/usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe...

--
Chuck



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -