X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=phynRVB
	le64QkngSkd59Ddxq+4OVwuCtTZLru0CctjdXmFDw1yY6Np5B15SF9AuKBp7JWT1
	VyoKw/fLnXSflNashJ3Tt1TaEtVBQ4BlfTyInHY8NxnwxGiWaAxfvwq/qBp/e60H
	T42VMDx2cELdYKS5i1msRg9Dh59loRcAiA+k=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=GaYZpxPTl1ARS
	y0TX19cWKl3T5c=; b=XOKBkdlRUWte7pnD2/qVKD+4XnaKs2LGw6bKcGS1g8bJi
	h4bU1hL927mzU0TQuS+zgbaH5RSE0euYwrJ0UAiYKJySnNfajlJYfSMqfSugAAUm
	6HwmJP6aT2X7IaYEs1SfoBXnqpb2MGC1CLS0YiOgF6EI3GL2Mh5HTaYzrEV6+E=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-wi0-f175.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.194.175.66 with SMTP id by2mr857076wjc.59.1384864089841; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 04:28:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<528B4A44.90104@gmail.com>
References:	<CAC2zJ1te9zA2uGcUJM0c57X9ivr9t523-n7YgK52X7VCbB-L8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <528B4A44 DOT 90104 AT gmail DOT com>
From:	Sophoklis Goumas <olspookishmagus AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:27:48 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAC2zJ1vEXQ2i4-1CkGiHSpU4oC=tvmwbnQsMuBNRsJ+DdogvAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> the two reports are separated
>
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64
>

I know and hence this discussion.

But should omitting the arch criteria, tha being the '&arch=x86_64'
part of the the URI return ALL the relevant results?

Sophoklis

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -