X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=NUDmVHfMgHPSocuKOuace/9Aqp79LC2IJE7BhXksryf
	ynK21tge10pvU4jXS72S6uuk63FB18MsfvZxcH9m7UYD02mQFvAlSi/IXH+c25Rg
	EQA46F7lX5xmQ7CCrSDU5GxC/PLK2ThiMQ2drBK5ghsrankPwptj4SdBv0CGw2+k
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=Z09uGkc0MBpgWbTabVOpVxqVj1A=; b=Vwwr0ssj+FS+GpzhQ
	rixFI9HHhqDvBnqrgASKSXcA2SLBMDP1jwaLxhaoHZ2UAxfn+J83I5VUMQKc3gwP
	VzqVWL+sRbaNd6uC5nexgSnbUpC4w4FIO6NMzgnowQVR+tk22db3sbDa2iFz2Iju
	KQHFwenRPbOsLZzj03Y2VqSTz4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-bk0-f51.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.205.14.69 with SMTP id pp5mr16127420bkb.14.1384860232247; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<528B4A44.90104@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:23:48 +0100
From:	marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?
References:	<CAC2zJ1te9zA2uGcUJM0c57X9ivr9t523-n7YgK52X7VCbB-L8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAC2zJ1te9zA2uGcUJM0c57X9ivr9t523-n7YgK52X7VCbB-L8g@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Il 11/19/2013 12:04 PM, Sophoklis Goumas ha scritto:
> Hello everyone, and a special hello to this mailing list's regulars!
>
> Shouldn't the following:
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra
>
> return results for both x86 and x86_64 architectures?
>
> Sophoklis
>
the two reports are separated

http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -