X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id
	:resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=ApGM
	tMsgwm5xbsjW6+qhMsgESRNYfzaVbhNRRsEdz5uhhHq7wZz5UQ5TrNRuxZK6QNLo
	m249pyM8nCfGXunL16XZp4fNIw9ZJbJCl6cxgw1FGlnzkDF/eA7fUxPlg9pX+Bvb
	bkylAVySajTNUWfj/FxOO7zm0QmnlnaFa33Coj8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id
	:resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=Ef6iVkKQP0
	jBdCF9a2E3lPFymjk=; b=PozjBEKKkVyIwyD8zTCXP/jh4Z0POtGPBlRkexcDSb
	RzNe5PI0MnXWSWKSRHhi4apvyxhu0/8aGYbn2GeXHfdBrjb7a1pffpZhu/jA8ni3
	FdOjaSJ6TxE4sq7KgmgJnysNTBsIVZRVGVmXFKqcnj/chvBGWVusHvMyIM1ABoW3
	I=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-98.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX18i0GnFQRN/hJ180izEQrZW
Resent-From:	Christopher Faylor <me AT cgf DOT cx>
Resent-Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:25:35 -0500
Resent-Message-ID:	<20131105052535 DOT GA7550 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Resent-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:24:05 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin exe magic does not understand .com extension? [or .exe sometimes]
Message-ID:	<20131105052405.GA7456@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3310368726 DOT 20131105025244 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20131105035821 DOT GB3059 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20131105044434 DOT GA23590 AT raf DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20131105044434.GA23590@raf.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:44:35PM +1100, <someone who insists on putting "cygwin" in their email address without using their real name> wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:52:44AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> >Greetings, All!
>> >
>> >$ mode<Tab>
>> >mode.com     modemui.dll  modex.dll
>> 
>> That would be /bin/sh exe magic from the looks of it.  It is probably
>> just trying to find anything with an executable bit set, just like on
>> Linux.
>> 
>> >$ mode
>> >bash: mode: command not found
>> >
>> >Now, I see two issues.
>> >First, it is that it see .dll files as executables. Which is true in essence,
>> >but rather suspicious, as .dll files are normally not directly executable.
>> >Would really like an explanation for this behavior.
>> >
>> >Second, is that it actually see mode.com, but unable to execute it.
>> 
>> It's likely that "mode.com" would execute it.
>
>this sounds like the problem i posted about the other day that trying to
>execute gcc doesn't work but gcc.exe does. it's a pity. i wish someone had
>an explanation why it happens with some programs like gcc (and mode) but not
>others. a solution would be even better. but i've given up trying to compile
>python modules so i can live with the failure.

No, this isn't the same thing at all.  It is perfectly understandable
why you'd need to type 'mode.com'.  The only reason why you'd need to
add .exe to gcc is if you either have a gcc without an extension
somewhere or you aren't using a cygwin program to start gcc.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -