X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=nhJmfFacu9EyPFcHFNxdtJznmSQ48/xIXk/s7Gl+HLp
	w9dFRpt/HUdZt5ktfawXPs6yQp3efM85ZirM1snLRyGqQI9gQ+hyWOx8VP6tVccD
	C9DYThvKhWz6ArXVn5HItORNk6varfKvgbdHhBRSJuTLNkQEUvjJgP2Egp5LQ2Hg
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=+SwV9WOwgFEm7WMCM7ZlDGAJwms=; b=dDRq5H8Of7LxZH824
	VCpg05Nunbuj2ghUgPnN3Eztx71AJOPHQ0vXQWUqB3pYjiX3GJtiPRXMRYRxPr90
	ZPowE912o7rUx/sExcsNi64LOFht6LPJEs0Vw630KyPe4JI6+gXfzGoxgXJ+OK7V
	Ot7ZyzxP0W1fzeuiXAO9+QYjpw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-pa0-f41.google.com
X-Received:	by 10.68.253.129 with SMTP id aa1mr261329pbd.189.1383617917363; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID:	<5278557C.2090205@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:18:36 -0600
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails
References:	<52749A63 DOT 70803 AT acm DOT org> <20131102093635 DOT GB25012 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5275D706 DOT 5030207 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20131104114204 DOT GB2731 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5277B2F3 DOT 1060705 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To:	<5277B2F3.1060705@cwilson.fastmail.fm>

On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
> aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
> and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate.  'Course, my
> to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users
> with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup
> doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism).
>
> The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and
> sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin.
>
> If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what?
>
> Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers?  Use $libexecdir but
> "know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately?  I'm
> confused as to how to proceed here.

Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with 
--libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense.


Yaakov



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -