X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=P7QL0dJeEFqQIvSdKfFhxdgEa7Q1YY1Tivu8Mhah0Ft/NqCHyGn6h
	vrLx7xXxb77XuCD9QzupmworFB97NBDnq68vITaj3lm+lxyNpMgMDuNgS1hj5CtR
	q0mhNyO9Gl6hQtwZv6i09xpOIcW0KA5nOoovwFaoe2+jfInrQORa7Y=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=ZHq1TGMDvlgbBamMwKS46Gr2o+I=; b=qFfecp0KpealBZ6+UnQyl6EJCVNi
	Y0Yr8qn6TGjO0s2WKXDghv9aQ56s+IrPwPnx0ErSBLl+X+C93UdEOaOOcH3cTIEr
	hYFML786nA/rfV48bobd44xGqHbct5mb2srC4Xf/jDlQSf5lxTqxeUHHaFiMoHMf
	xnnyArXFfDGuOIY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX189BrX2cOirza0EdEY1u3by
Date:	Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:01:42 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Rebuilding cygwin1.dll - error: "TRANSACTION_ALL_ACCESS" redefined [-Werror]
Message-ID:	<20131028170142.GA2994@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<52692BAC DOT 5060800 AT mandriva DOT com> <20131024150921 DOT GB24229 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQJrD6e2xy18utjm2WqAoVc6seAKR88ocWhiqot3W54m5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CABEPuQLku+UFmoF2Wb6dUBvUEQw8sbmgG4mv-UiMgdSC=t+0TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20131026062530 DOT GA5850 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20131026094704 DOT GA15394 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20131027012705 DOT GA1534 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20131027095159 DOT GA29907 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <526E9418 DOT 9060603 AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<526E9418.9060603@cygwin.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:43:04PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 10/27/2013 5:51 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Oct 26 21:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:47:04AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>> On Oct 26 02:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:14:01AM +0400, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
>>>>>> /usr/include/w32api/winnt.h:3541:20: error: previous definition of
>>>>>> ?struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD?
>>>>>>      typedef struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD {
>>>>>>                     ^
>>>>>> In file included from /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/exception.h:15:0,
>>>>>>                  from /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/cygtls.cc:20:
>>>>>> /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/exceptions.h:109:17: error: invalid
>>>>>> type in declaration before ?;? token
>>>>>> } exception_list;
>>>>>>                  ^
>>>>>> /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/../Makefile.common:43: recipe for target
>>>>>> 'cygtls.o' failed
>>>>>> make[3]: *** [cygtls.o] Error 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to provide patches.  Simple compilation issues do not
>>>>> require copyright assignment.
>>>>
>>>> I applied a patch.  The redefinition of _exception_list to
>>>> _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD for x86_64 was cruft from a very early
>>>> "just build, goddammit" porting stage.  Later on it turned out that
>>>> x86_64 doesn't use frame based exception handling anyway so all the
>>>> code using _exception_list is unused on x86_64 anyway.
>>>>
>>>> I also changed the public header <exceptions.h> so that it only
>>>> applies if !x86_64.
>>>>
>>>> That leads to a question:
>>>>
>>>> Why on earth do we have a *public* header exposing the exception
>>>> handling on a certain CPU?  This isn't a standard header, neither POSIX
>>>> nor Linux nor BSD systems have it.
>>>>
>>>> If there isn't a compelling reason to keep the header, I would opt
>>>> for folding the content into the private Cygwin header exception.h
>>>> and drop the public header entirely.
>>>
>>> I think its existence predates me.  I vote to nuke it.
>>
>> 2 pro votes, 0 dissenting votes.  Done.  I just hope the voting period
>> wasn't too short...
>
>I demand a recount! ;-)

Looks like, with 2 people responding, the votes are now 5 pro, 0
dissenting.  Luckily for us we use Diebold voting machines so there is
no possibility of error.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -