X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=pd226e9KE/Jd8O18b2bzsN6S6rHKmnbLpCMTTEQZGqXsJJ2BQBn1A
	OXcsX3x/lLM1+NOuRXXWUp3kj5il7xc2jAg6jtIoOaXeADyDC4sNiAwD10NfPxPj
	DIm7LaxGnbuWbtNqJUsccsP5W+JR6R24weBJTHVPj2IBEeHPHH4Md4=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=om3ENfyyO0YlM9/Xocxi1tqnv/Q=; b=Ol6N3K7/+USFu413Cdl+mwGvC8V0
	KRb9OP47Yi4Gl756TV9rM7I+vBkYMvUoWMxgX1UjHDMh34rrD1JllL7FZ0JVWgtA
	nDdxMrJtNhin1sTgc3TKsK2Tya0ajbTRXXEDqgZWCwCA292uTZWOz1ntZkaBE1w9
	cAeXiMNODIyqCUo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	calimero.vinschen.de
Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:51:59 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Rebuilding cygwin1.dll - error: "TRANSACTION_ALL_ACCESS" redefined [-Werror]
Message-ID:	<20131027095159.GA29907@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<52692BAC DOT 5060800 AT mandriva DOT com> <20131024150921 DOT GB24229 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CABEPuQJrD6e2xy18utjm2WqAoVc6seAKR88ocWhiqot3W54m5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CABEPuQLku+UFmoF2Wb6dUBvUEQw8sbmgG4mv-UiMgdSC=t+0TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20131026062530 DOT GA5850 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20131026094704 DOT GA15394 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20131027012705 DOT GA1534 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20131027012705.GA1534@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 26 21:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:47:04AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Oct 26 02:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:14:01AM +0400, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
> >> >/usr/include/w32api/winnt.h:3541:20: error: previous definition of
> >> >?struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD?
> >> >     typedef struct _EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD {
> >> >                    ^
> >> >In file included from /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/exception.h:15:0,
> >> >                 from /work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/cygtls.cc:20:
> >> >/work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/include/exceptions.h:109:17: error: invalid
> >> >type in declaration before ?;? token
> >> > } exception_list;
> >> >                 ^
> >> >/work/Cygwin/winsup/cygwin/../Makefile.common:43: recipe for target
> >> >'cygtls.o' failed
> >> >make[3]: *** [cygtls.o] Error 1
> >>=20
> >> Feel free to provide patches.  Simple compilation issues do not
> >> require copyright assignment.
> >
> >I applied a patch.  The redefinition of _exception_list to
> >_EXCEPTION_REGISTRATION_RECORD for x86_64 was cruft from a very early
> >"just build, goddammit" porting stage.  Later on it turned out that
> >x86_64 doesn't use frame based exception handling anyway so all the
> >code using _exception_list is unused on x86_64 anyway.
> >
> >I also changed the public header <exceptions.h> so that it only
> >applies if !x86_64.
> >
> >That leads to a question:
> >
> >Why on earth do we have a *public* header exposing the exception
> >handling on a certain CPU?  This isn't a standard header, neither POSIX
> >nor Linux nor BSD systems have it.
> >
> >If there isn't a compelling reason to keep the header, I would opt
> >for folding the content into the private Cygwin header exception.h
> >and drop the public header entirely.
>=20
> I think its existence predates me.  I vote to nuke it.

2 pro votes, 0 dissenting votes.  Done.  I just hope the voting period
wasn't too short...


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=Pq4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--

- Raw text -