delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/10/24/13:36:36

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=F3HCS/nkJOa/UlyP
QLyfKZr6yZHXbC8ca3bMGe72UT8NyDoHC9d/XFZQiX5B1D8wPzHVzWEQ6QnpyHhG
bX78OLWg1wdbAGikgcfJFCrahsOZsXP5e0alePPi5fJyl8fr+cg00oiRyouZbXgN
kodydSVrrPe7sp0Zc2KTPyeXSUw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=sZ+3DfXvi2J6VDAKoidexU
9zdcA=; b=CIRNwZMrInXNwgqfQsX8+2xCVYISlzLIGuOee+/1eaeK5bQ3C1Y9Jk
YUEdW2ztcqgws9M7cwoqzVuqdKubupZGD3DC+mZDyzeOFQhsgbJlEWQ1AMezxRYw
wRSfqIf6d4c3fScjsgm7d08CgrFq7yDl2VuyTRnMU7BUYPdG2l2mc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173015pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <52695A94.50006@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:36:20 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CHERE package missing from 64-bit Setup 2.830
References: <CE883C03C6B27343A6A342B05FDFA372654134 AT BL2PRD0711MB433 DOT namprd07 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <526840CF DOT 1090803 AT cygwin DOT com> <CE883C03C6B27343A6A342B05FDFA372654318 AT BL2PRD0711MB433 DOT namprd07 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CE883C03C6B27343A6A342B05FDFA372654318@BL2PRD0711MB433.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

On 10/23/2013 7:27 PM, Charles Butterfield wrote:
> Larry - Thanks for your suggestions regarding mixing 32 and 64-bit
> installations (CHERE, INETUTILS, PING, etc). I have a couple of follow-on
> questions:
>
> 1) Can I simply copy the 32-bit binaries into the 64-bit "bin"
> directory?

You could but it's not recommended.  For one thing, you'd be ruining your
32-bit install and setting yourself up to overwrite the 32-bit versions
when the 64-bit ones arrive.  Too messy... at least.

> That is, will they work fine with the 64-bit Cygwin DLLs in the path? Or do
> I need to augment my path to include the 32-bit bin directories as well
> (such as in my .bashrc file)?

You can call the 32-bit from 64-bit-land (i.e. call a 32-bit "ls.exe" from
a 64-bit "bash").  If you want this to happen transparently, I'd recommend
putting the 32-bit bin path in your "PATH" environment variable after your
64-bit paths.

> 2) I assumed CHERE somehow encodes "where minty and bash are".

Yes, it will use the 32-bit versions of these.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019