X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=D8Yw
	E4r4Tz31aS7m0aFAfqY+/ZY5rze61e+wyuOfof3//3KRsMMOMMN4+jGk6UbC4zWZ
	sZfcm965kC9wUi8WcjJzfEV3fa+mjGYAzQOWmN5S3Yfv9IKrfiMvM79GbAGeWASg
	wtCpEK4+P9AJWMlqk5VQMIrg1/a2LMSIFFKkTk8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=okmCqTO6qA
	ILAEbftMsLnN8ox+0=; b=o7fs/ta8XyqdXyRhy11L1/wINN0ql5Oojfo5hYgucf
	F27Gjc+zkekoLTiiG/lizJHrecifB7OOqFQ/vRXhirUKjk48A1DdKMxSjLBQu0kl
	xo9jMyxWLGkkEErq7iiHjEKrEyGQ9qVCL7rTzhet5ThFMQaJF8WbFXDA1E+d/e5f
	8=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail.spocom.com
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 19:08:13 -0700
From:	Gary Johnson <garyjohn AT spocom DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: checking in >= 256k file fatally corrupts rcs file
Message-ID:	<20131009020813.GA15389@phoenix>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20131008102204 DOT GB9241 AT plunk DOT org> <525499E5 DOT 4090608 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131009003055 DOT GA30082 AT plunk DOT org> <5254B1C0 DOT 9020004 AT etr-usa DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<5254B1C0.9020004@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On 2013-10-08, Warren Young wrote:
> On 10/8/2013 18:30, Don Hatch wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:48:53PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> >>On 10/8/2013 04:22, Don Hatch wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Checking in a text file of size >= 256k
> >>>corrupts the rcs file, irretrievably losing most of the contents
> >>
> >>It's documented in the rcs NEWS file:
> >
> >That quote certainly doesn't describe or justify the very serious
> >corruption bug I'm seeing in any way;
> 
> I'm not trying to justify it.  I'm just pointing out that you have an
> expedient workaround for the bug which lets you run on current
> versions of Cygwin rcs.
> 
> >it would be really good if the feature
> >could be backed out, and possibly re-introduced at a later time
> >after it has been re-worked so that doesn't break the product.
> 
> If the bug affects GNU rcs on all platforms, it needs to be fixed
> upstream.  Then Cygwin rcs will get the fix when the Cygwin rcs
> package maintainer updates the packages.
> 
> If the bug is in the Cygwin rcs port or in Cygwin itself, the actual
> bug needs to be fixed, rather than hack out the feature that tickles
> the bug.

There was a discussion around March 27, 2012, about another change
in the behavior of RCS between 5.7 and 5.8.  It appears that someone
decided to make some sweeping "improvements" to RCS and broke a few
things along the way.

Regards,
Gary


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -