X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Vi
	t9FlxHYMIMBqgbyuWGWiFjxnE0p05GJk8cfiALWtTQUTyZWv1qSxCa6PlEYN71Hw
	5Cpk0EhOqBpSj7Ii0YGxJqhVKZy3IOxO6ctjKT2R4dbRtu2EHV3Dcuabd7du92R2
	nJ1PxrLaFKn66uRnDk3hYMeNZmnpeCmUxCNWF+XOE=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=87KfVg82
	eHrmvd2vcHT0t1trUns=; b=T3jWdrSzjDHkc50aX0In8fvOKWqedzozp6ANoBiw
	qphl9QQKxAA++suue9bjiMDLg+jr4A30jBXFAW75TU18FKzMjIybmp+o7+bgDVeS
	0HNfHB2sUz8pIXNTtN20SuE/H4xm4zUTaxOZueleeIXxq1BP5OA3yBr1d9NMZDqv
	2D4=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mail-pa0-f48.google.com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.68.203.34 with SMTP id kn2mr3745601pbc.82.1381260346468; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<524DF640.9080701@cygwin.com>
References:	<CAJty3ZxPwByrCu6No2-53vc3QiDXX1G8KZd3RC5K8xBEA4k2ww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <524DE69B DOT 1090301 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <524DF640 DOT 9080701 AT cygwin DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 15:25:46 -0400
Message-ID:	<CACUHbYOHSKPrX1JP+_RorxMEe=KZewHbv+uRM2sjsycHQqvjzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: fixing BLODA-caused fork failures
From:	David Boyce <dsb AT boyski DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> But as a point of practicality, 64-bit Cygwin can help with some cases of
> DLL address space collisions.  So if you haven't experimented with
> 64-bit Cygwin in your environment, it may be worth your time.

This sounds very reasonable but I'm curious: is it to date just a
theory that makes sense or have there been actual reports of 64-bit
Cygwin solving address-space collisions?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -