X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=qGMFp40YB1nigIz9
	QoLKj8s76TOR0Lb4/NW4m+xgSoe9FiiCpE/xE0qQszDDi+ujNCq2uOUGc9aJMbvg
	FMAaX/wdGUqaSHgMkgiKrST6xjy2HK8u8vBTrOxdA1oku3B/7kVF1YUlkE/MY6d6
	KFM95zxgeqc/eAKfIeYaTXlcGyw=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qecrNegAj3b++Z6mOeQwqw
	tH6gI=; b=nSEC4hRWtR5twKA75ksmFrjtAf1gmQp9Y8Xa7+pBf4Of5dGdEfCcNn
	d0f17diLZRo1TsBOY9JGqo3MlmqsFxjHgDhvim3M8rESx0jSDlfKJ8FRG+NQd6wv
	sr0reQ7va2QctYYfin/AAvcaESkBd5pfumuppl0jEFZ5dtRLNGVuo=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173001pub.verizon.net
Message-id:	<52434333.9010201@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:10:27 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cp vs copy performance over local network
References:	<CAJyLC6sbpLsGXpt2U8u1QOCw+7AhYuo73Q8e2V_K=fu7ujaKkg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <52432BDB DOT 7080809 AT cygwin DOT com> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C3F2F18 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov>
In-reply-to:	<5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C3F2F18@MLBXv04.nih.gov>

On 9/25/2013 3:45 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
>> There's overhead to handle POSIX permissions, etc.
>
> For one file, the effects of copying the meta-data should be negligible.

You're right.  I didn't really look at the example (1 file) and the timing
difference (~10 sec).  I was assuming multiple files.  strace output still
might provide some insight.  Or perhaps as Andrey suggests, the x86_64
version might make up the difference.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -