X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=UPjvEl4NxxGdeUB306f1ulxmu8VLLoo4BkiQGtZNax3GvoRFzyE9R
	khqBxIukum5lrPofOkmx964mELBiw1to2t5Tx4OlnzIvV66HMO15mDeqhK67jWzr
	7tP/KEtD2/E+BFTJTPu3IGcZQpHUjUk0gU8TBIaSA+rYjnK+t1lH2Y=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=NqzrJxpbOK2cu6ze718LL8VuUa4=; b=dWaFXngYqI9h9nTmBvFiRmGkVuvt
	f9ffMtnv5XyyBGmcjltOrCfV8vKmtbfmRMpCAY4NHIzR9AOHxkHI8ZQ62qxcxB4D
	Gg+3HR5GNEKWXFXSFkNw3nexGrp0wGN9OUklbTZK18OshpUEahCIE1kSGLAGtiUx
	R695dd/h840k/uY=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	Yes, score=6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_LOCALHOST,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler:	Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To:	abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User:	U2FsdGVkX1/DduZGMgqk7ihdg1KPyfuT
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:05:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)
Message-ID:	<20130925170543.GA6705@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAPw2sphgi3r6U=ZvUj7ywS1JYOgPY2f4spuDW8Frff5gUCsrtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130918174034 DOT GB2351 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAPw2spi2cQMRid83Zg53d3QvaA9J=2=kBXet_0SHnZtOxmwjDg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5239EC4C DOT 7060904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <CAPw2sph9GFaR_PLsvfWj-1FR0G0qLuaPAGnqN4RWqJEitdE8tA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAPw2sph0tFg_5g_Tt1M4gPcRoORmv-YeEPzSGto-MnguFwxBcA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5242F7FC DOT 8020003 AT cygwin DOT com> <CAPw2sph5vs9+_H8AYeNgcLyitRcVG9f_XEm+8Zc2edfAqKCVTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5243064C DOT 50004 AT cygwin DOT com> <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA217707C AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA217707C@MLBXV06.nih.gov>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:59:57PM +0000, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
>Does setup for 64 bit cygwin need to be 64 bit?  Might all this
>be avoided if setup-x86_64.exe were itself 32 bit application?

I lost that argument.  Apparently some 64-bit systems can't run 32-bit
applications.  I wanted to just have one setup with a check box
determining which version to install.  That idea was vehemently
rejected.

However, this should work (I haven't tried lately):

.\setup-x86 --arch=x86_64

Assuming you aren't part of the .001% who can't run x86 executables.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -