X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
	:content-type:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Pxr3ApL4K0qy0liOC/u
	+mTIPBHB0KajM2ej1Sw27Az0FiNvfxDZWHZAu1tDuTDqToNkhJBrSrCwA/3OEPB3
	0Tqs3gHeVqH9gpqUU+9wCjzU2oTVOf97FtMJl8fKzJqGQ8Ref9/cTQpXaJZG4xEW
	0r4NXg824lzWszlD5i4rcaMo=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
	:content-type:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=8m4MVnFR4xto9hClmuBLh+/EM
	lM=; b=mY+7ZAulGZ8OD+RXnKC3CTESAwc1RgywhdXLSXH+iH09d4LNNIB/KQs16
	yiAVvOfoekphqc1qMg04wPV5fVTm1jKPMrgnDjjDKC5WX8KVfSkH9h74j2suRw1U
	If+e9ejeHuE9Is8KbF3oOt8vjxMebn6V/3DMjnpNvIae8LmvYk=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	vms173021pub.verizon.net
MIME-version:	1.0
Message-id:	<5242F7FC.8020003@cygwin.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:49:32 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe)
References:	<CAPw2spinsbSZaduOMJtgR6rkaoJA9s7rTm6LCwvWBCK9-kiN8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5231EEF4 DOT 6010407 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <CAPw2sphgi3r6U=ZvUj7ywS1JYOgPY2f4spuDW8Frff5gUCsrtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130918174034 DOT GB2351 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAPw2spi2cQMRid83Zg53d3QvaA9J=2=kBXet_0SHnZtOxmwjDg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5239EC4C DOT 7060904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <CAPw2sph9GFaR_PLsvfWj-1FR0G0qLuaPAGnqN4RWqJEitdE8tA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAPw2sph0tFg_5g_Tt1M4gPcRoORmv-YeEPzSGto-MnguFwxBcA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to:	<CAPw2sph0tFg_5g_Tt1M4gPcRoORmv-YeEPzSGto-MnguFwxBcA@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/25/2013 10:11 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:

<snip>

> In fact, what would be the issue to set the requested execution level
> to "asInvoker" for the official setup-x86_64.exe?
> People with admin rights will still be able to install for all users
> and people without admin rights will be able to install for
> them-selves.

Doesn't that mean that "setup-x86_64.exe" needs to be "Run as Administrator"
to be installed for "All Users"?  If so, I wouldn't be in favor of the
change because it changes the default install behavior (= more confusion/
list traffic).

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -