delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2013/09/18/14:40:12

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:to:from:subject:mime-version
:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=M58fxKMuP7t1ls0jO4L+++msv2/Hb
HIC4rEsZdmNxrOKkE19RUnvZFiNje/nVR3/aEPSpssFwhfX9prFl/M48zO/tv6cX
3zL+T8tAEmOBM905x36TOIEbvAvdrugBJTgfvrxMprPcNrXJQLmPcITeVfGTnv/y
DXjnko7SFcW+6w=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
:list-help:sender:message-id:date:to:from:subject:mime-version
:content-type; s=default; bh=Ce2+yD3LhAzxazW51zb5eov23wM=; b=Ct9
jV8hf73JRWAAOO990Hwkh4AWtAmnA+6LBN/ywMMpuMVXzulg36Jdgi1OTFNdY4zC
Jdw5bF4InHdhdhFWgC8YWzlPqRbi9LKdasIRkCgIai7sQ4HzAwa6YHtpu6bX5DOP
nmhIhwlUlkCjL99AjXcLxSlGfFWDcIXPEVIFFy48=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,POKER_BODY,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx.binnacle.cx
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130918141146.03a25770@binnacle.cx>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:19:10 -0400
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: starlight DOT 2013z3 AT binnacle DOT cx
Subject: /dev/random does not block, emits poor entropy
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -1 () ALL_TRUSTED
Received-SPF: pass (mx.binnacle.cx: 172.29.87.10 is whitelisted by SPF-milter whitelist entry)

Hello,

While poking around TRNG quality I came
across this apparent issue:

   /dev/random does not block, emits poor entropy

Running 1.7.17 but see no updates in the
1.7.18 thru 1.7.25 Changelog entries
regarding /dev/random.

Due to 'argp' library issues I could not
compile 'rngtest' under Cygwin.  Worked
around it by running

   netcat -l -p 8989 172.29.88.18 </dev/random

on the Windows side and

   ncat 172.29.88.10 8989 | rngtest -t 10

on the Linux machine.  Output looks like

rngtest: FIPS tests speed: (min=389.946; avg=74898.778; max=94811.893)Kibits/s
rngtest: Program run time: 60032020 microseconds
rngtest: bits received from input: 3088523264
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 successes: 154295
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 131
rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Monobit: 17
rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Poker: 15
rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Runs: 53
rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Long run: 47
rngtest: FIPS 140-2(2001-10-10) Continuous run: 0
rngtest: input channel speed: (min=393.292; avg=188386.332; max=887784.091)Kibits/s
rngtest: FIPS tests speed: (min=389.946; avg=74949.192; max=94811.893)Kibits/s
rngtest: Program run time: 69528238 microseconds

which I think would qualify as "not great."
Is similar to what I see when running

   rngtest -t 10 /dev/urandom

on Linux.

My guess is that the /dev/random driver needs an
adjustment to block when the MS crypto function
calls indicate a lack of available entropy
--assuming that the MS libraries support
entropy qualification of some kind.

I don't subscribe to the list (though I do
look at the archives), so please CC me
on any requests for my input.

Regards


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019