X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=RXSJG8RNiJog3egYi5WAf0VRvjoSXJW0sCjpt9EDpgh
	toltDaJKYnIk7jkT8hQRZCOBPDRPbRjY0NjaaTG3l9ED/jxZJAtUk6O2xfZTOfiW
	fDmn5WLB4xngpSiWCwWRfpsYpqgWIf+lxsmIcQ8fETK0Y1R6hfi+Mn9lb4v/YO4Q
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=/pqgZG9pzrd5B7E/SuCjBOilLCA=; b=ZpADJi5Zxhw4wtCGU
	KmV8zJtNVQUsTc1fgzyW1nk182OyB37azDHOnTem2VC6wvS7jTFTBTP8k2UvJbVA
	aI2KiyDZJX9DnG44Cu9vnp6CF01U/zDeLiur3aIhwwwxG92PmdDT4b+9ScJS3HnU
	a/r+s2FBoXZ51rFQxHQVUNbarI=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found:	No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO:	out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
Message-ID:	<521F84D8.7090908@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:28:56 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: xz -9 : Cannot allocate memory
References:	<50A41697 DOT 3080406 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <loom DOT 20130829T155739-66 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20130829T162752-851 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20130829151121 DOT GR21571 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <521F699C DOT 1060703 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20130829160000 DOT GT21571 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20130829160000.GT21571@calimero.vinschen.de>

On 8/29/2013 12:00 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 29 11:32, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> So...this is NOTABUG, right?
>
> Right.  But is a bit lame that it just fails.  Does it have to use
> this big buffer or would it also work with a smaller buffer, if there's
> no memory chunk big enough?

 From what I understand, it will /not/ be able to perform the kinds of 
tasks that -9 specifies.  E.g. -9 represents a collection of tuning 
parameters, including such things as "and use a gigantic dictionary to 
store bit sequences that may repeat, and hence be represented by 
shortened codes".  If you want a -9-sized dictionary, and you can't get 
it...xz shouldn't fall back to a -8-sized one.

--
Chuck



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -