X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	q=dns; s=default; b=vaH6AqQP4gmP2VTm9a6Kc2rUgyz4iBb1St0qdz/yFSR
	ZlPtVHN0ZQ2ft91EcvowJ+8TXOOHYOHhTs5gg5ppAZBs9opq/2NexX5PQBT52wPN
	OAzHgpteHTawEVetnJGtbIDeaG2sfzgj/ig5Y2Tw2zERPP9hvfHL4jnGDwW4/rIE
	=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=default; bh=7qas+ekNQFxHTKPgIboOKTrE9sQ=; b=uOBJtcjK/g7Q9ja9A
	lByuSErWWyDJlOI4vbh0KGXri4+mnzwEGUmNYVuakMjie1JU+t2CEdidr01Q/xUZ
	/RrhuiM1BS37CvUpXYLZIVmWydK1bFOIj0VYFxUor9kzLHq+gJzkWeDRaZCOFQje
	YxnT+at8xCW1TC9+7MYZPGdrhM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Received:	by 10.50.78.130 with SMTP id b2mr2877617igx.41.1377290129527; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID:	<5217C78E.6000401@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:35:26 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: .tar.xz for snapshots?
References:	<52178DCF DOT 1000001 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130823171546 DOT GA6035 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CA+sc5mmg-9E+1q0CuxAFGfM36OOVtGruGnY8fdZW7MKwAPHJ0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAFWoy7GD-0h3sf49tE3XULXhef4OGmCz_Cu5Hv7da2763JnvaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130823180918 DOT GA1584 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130823181443 DOT GD2562 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5217A6E8 DOT 4000109 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130823191707 DOT GB1446 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20130823191707.GB1446@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

On 2013-08-23 14:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:16:08PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 8/23/2013 12:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Doesn't xz also have a faster uncompression than bzip2?
>>
>> Yup: http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks.html
>
> Well there you go then...

Which reminds me:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-01/msg00087.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2012-02/msg00000.html

(and subsequent threads).


Yaakov


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -