X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=ZO0KP2oKd93wO+erjXq7f4boUXgNRmOEnAwnI0Q9YMIdrg/d/LgQT
	s7LoD4hmhvpGg0mz7LrScMsxp9cUSq6qDSQH+q9s/+g93BJK+eNYwMd7JOqgIjZo
	jzpUFiUzuvVq9l9o9rLgeZr6yNT19rXSYcQlSreItHtwNBSdCTD60Q=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=DmMdfTSKQm3ga894NmEO/cZQuK0=; b=ARG5ccD+5nl8eZvauGS9v6Ngob9c
	hiwxRUmBsPkAxsyJ8Y93lEoqI+UAGpbYdG1P8K/j6j3IcAYTasPrAmwncM39/b1T
	yG6J3BA+GC1KAMFKqFTMmIs0209JvwdnMmxHgG/75KyizlhD78/u9TjLD58qhplc
	k+xGbvupMXtjGFw=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:04:15 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 64-bit Cygwin installation is missing /usr/bin/lockfile
Message-ID:	<20130814140415.GJ4315@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAMCTF-euv+5ZvBWfc8Gv6G4wuEyGH1_guDZPTZQDxD+G4dn6kQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAMCTF-euv+5ZvBWfc8Gv6G4wuEyGH1_guDZPTZQDxD+G4dn6kQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Virus-Found:	No

--SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 14 09:43, Steve Rowley wrote:
> > On 8/13/2013 6:49 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:29:46PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> >>> On 8/13/2013 5:01 PM, Steve Rowley wrote:
> >>> I just installed 64-bit Cygwin on Win7, and noticed that
> >>> /usr/bin/lockfile is missing in my installation.
> >>>
> >> As always, you can find what package something is in by searching for =
it
> >> here: <http://cygwin.com/packages/>
> >>
> >> In the case of lockfile, you can see the results here:
> >> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=3Dusr%2Fbin%2Flockfi=
le>
> >>
> >> However note that, currently, this only searches the 32-bit version of
> >> Cygwin.  Some packages are still missing from the 64-bit version.
> >
> > The fact that some packages don't exist yet for 64-bit is something
> > that does deserve highlighting.  Of course, whether or not the package
> > actually exists for 64-bit, the package search will tell you if it
> > exists in the 32-bit world, so at least one knows what to look for.
> > In this particular case, I did go looking to see if 'procmail' was
> > already available for 64-bit.  As it turns out, it is.
>=20
> Thank you for for the pointer to how to find the Cygwin package
> containing a file; that is indeed a useful thing to know.  Since
> procmail is the home of /usr/bin/lockfile, I reinstalled procmail.
>=20
> However, /usr/bin/lockfile is still missing.  Unpacking the procmail
> 3.22-12 tarball reveals that it contains only the
> /usr/share/doc/procmail/ directory, and 4 small documentation files.
> The rest of procmail is missing.
>=20
> If this is something that will take a while, then perhaps I should go
> back to the 32-bit installation so my scripts will work while waiting
> for a fix.  But as uninstalling and reinstalling a rather large Cygwin
> installation is painful, I'd rather not do this if lockfile will be
> available in a week or so.
>=20
> Does anyone have advice as to whether it's worth waiting vs going back
> to 32 bit?

It's just a packaging bug.  Somehow I tripped over the order of variable
evaluation.  I'm looking into it and provide a new 64 bit procmail later
today.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSC45fAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gAgYP/3Edvd4pPDyaKTbVl6pp2Ya1
79NQbprfHhUkb7W59YElaQRyHNiY3Nms9reu9VR/xUdolyNq217LmCQdhU5J+e3Q
mg9JSM3OGj9rhwyDX3YcHMDpk9Jx9IhbTxgZwVaq4OpkH6yVlUyGXWcDEhT9Z2rv
N866y9qeAGIYx0qwkVfurFAyTo7OiborGugmyUjQfpbXfPRKLDJDSeJEpDiUYTDF
/jUS1hQIBpT7Nn13WvmFOvtKpFBeUHrDK+byvFZQuR67jm7ygV9sS4FrQm9CCy7o
M7wuESsLqh5/KbpC6ydkJ0aEGVXLO2AwkZhgmMFN+sIkNowoShDfkQo9kJ5dSbZ9
kb/oFlrkfHV+gAWHdl+kdd8kpLv2IY0tlQg6u604dSHY5tdULIYDq/YwxtvH4toa
gV59XOdU/WN4k5X8GhOMjxd7n0/3/NztBkCaZi3+Fk6Wm8RYR1qrwDO/DpN0Zvtb
aj/a1O7imrZ8gYkHMjOfN+nF7/DxK8M/BE1dDkaxMckTLsc5+aMKiaLJ5vQyCwoE
6vRi4oX0szuhU9EthAvMCMIdYruwgKcDilsgJc+Da8CSA6YyfnTab/P6KUCZE21t
AZtKgMPHzlMJV1N5ZNf3UL+S2qu5vZwI+jVzzgdtc8QWGo9YyPr7cckpopoGRHGy
Q9DRI5b1SBNZX0bB0WKg
=SNOE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SBT+cnFS/G3NVgv4--

- Raw text -