X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ls108
	RKs+DpUKXhYfceyZ2vgOTo21bdAl8jLzH6+VRuFaNb/p+O9nn7OOVdNJdxtiTIWc
	x5SxxUVZte4caAV/GhYc0md41mvFgqqrykDgE2zMVYnGR2Zchabvlc3lvY5O+IRy
	8PSThDGusUBfHlGbyInuPJQFl+etXmQUTCBEwU=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=jA6Qegquxrv
	42HaucIzJeCV3aWI=; b=iT0sQbkM3W3oCYl1JRPdXGvBlxbtF84RIxI8bKdzYos
	ObKFDeWQbj17iMiJXyeUeIgnaoQcm2tc5DgluCb1Ibz6dcIBqDPzOC+3G7mxLwNk
	OK00FYV2YMa6JmHPet/gPfFUZJ3tByKY4Dp4ITx6m2LgHeZmvcRhIH+dSe2aN43A
	=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Message-Id:	<6.2.5.6.2.20130731132448.03acaec8@binnacle.cx>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:26:13 -0400
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	starlight DOT 2013z3 AT binnacle DOT cx
Subject:	Re: possible bug in 1.7.22-1 core DLLs
In-Reply-To:	<20130731172147.GA1692@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References:	<6 DOT 2 DOT 5 DOT 6 DOT 2 DOT 20130731121524 DOT 03acf020 AT binnacle DOT cx> <20130731172147 DOT GA1692 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Score:	-1 () ALL_TRUSTED
Received-SPF:	pass (mx.binnacle.cx: 172.29.87.10 is whitelisted by SPF-milter whitelist entry)

Well I uncovered a serious regression
and expressed a willingness to track
down the cause.

However your nasty reply and bad attitude
assures that I will defintiely not help
now.

At 01:21 PM 7/31/2013 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>You are right in assuming that newer DLLs should
>work with older binaries but no one is willing to
>do tech support or debugging based on vague
>problem reports.  So, it isn't clear exactly what
>you're expecting.  If you think someone is going
>to take a "1.7.16" installation and then drop a
>newer cygwin1.dll into it to debug your problem
>then you are likely going to be disappointed -
>especially if you can't even be bothered to
>subscribe to the mailing list.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -