X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=jRvmig/K4NQ1Mmc4has6jErbtMnUjv8FCafB0BA69841goPtnWJJs
	OacQHgVu+7Yh63dehsrDoCqNCIEWonin4SMedDqkSFdJ9lIV7b2dVzmrnqFgBw5Z
	kt1INWEm6C74CwAL8yPl4q7/0nC0mCMfyidsH/1Xy4kjEUtuHj1WJ8=
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	bh=jjzD3Ubkw2gON7eUzMeWh7spG2s=; b=PBZbvaOMP3C95y+L9y0jmtsT7p9L
	WM+e2hpr125qRzg8oZfXsD3fiFU2cc4nYRBmCJw9rG00RI9MNMu3Egu4TuT/O0pp
	SMzAf/4/1L2/lvEChhcguSWn///0K+KZ81+2UrubVQNpI/yhB/hs/4IdIcQMr4om
	xpaHbp5oG9vbNvM=
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status:	No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:11:11 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 32bit vs 64bit difference: SIGQUIT
Message-ID:	<20130731141111.GB4166@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<51F90C4C DOT 5040105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<51F90C4C.5040105@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Jul 31 09:08, Charles Wilson wrote:
> I was running the automake-1.12 test suite, and found a difference
> in behavior between the two cygwin's.  On 32bit, it appears to miss
> the SIGQUIT signal:
> 
> 
> ========== 32 bit ==========
> PASS: t/tap-signal.tap 1 - "make check" fails
> FAIL: t/tap-signal.tap 2 - count of test results
> PASS: t/tap-signal.tap 3 - TAP driver catch test termination by
> signal SIGHUP
> PASS: t/tap-signal.tap 4 - TAP driver catch test termination by
> signal SIGINT
> FAIL: t/tap-signal.tap 5 - TAP driver catch test termination by
> signal SIGQUIT

Hmm.

  $ cat

In another shell:

  $ ps
	PID    PPID    PGID     WINPID   TTY     UID    STIME COMMAND
	568    2276     568       2952  pty0    11001 16:08:59 /usr/bin/tcsh
       1696    1012    1696       1652  pty1    11001 16:09:08 /usr/bin/ps
       1012    1112    1012       2704  pty1    11001 16:09:05 /usr/bin/tcsh
  I    2324     568    2324        816  pty0    11001 16:09:02 /usr/bin/cat
       1112       1    1112       1112  ?       11001 16:09:05 /usr/bin/mintty
       2276       1    2276       2276  ?       11001 16:08:59 /usr/bin/mintty
  $ kill -QUIT 2324

In the first shell:

  Quit (core dumped)
  $

> .... which doesn't really tell you much without the rest of the test
> driver machinery, but I include it for completeness.
> 
> The point of this post is the following question: is there a known
> difference in the signal handling code between cygwin32 and cygwin64
> that could explain why I see different behavior with respect to
> SIGQUIT?

No.  STC?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -